2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2004.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imperfection of flux pinning classification based on the pinning center size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the typical metal reforming catalysts are prone to deactivation by coking, as well as sulfur poisoning [3][4][5]. Whereas coking can be controlled with excess steam (and/or oxygen injection), the high sulfur levels in these fuels will require sulfur removal upstream of the reformer [6], if conventional reforming catalysts are employed. Therefore, the successful reforming of these fuels will largely depend on the development of a catalyst, which is resistant to both sulfur and coking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the typical metal reforming catalysts are prone to deactivation by coking, as well as sulfur poisoning [3][4][5]. Whereas coking can be controlled with excess steam (and/or oxygen injection), the high sulfur levels in these fuels will require sulfur removal upstream of the reformer [6], if conventional reforming catalysts are employed. Therefore, the successful reforming of these fuels will largely depend on the development of a catalyst, which is resistant to both sulfur and coking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these deep-desulfurization processes are accompanied by a significant decrease of the octane number [11]. New methods for the reduction of sulfur compounds from liquid fuels are based on molecular sieves such as zeolites [12], the use of transition metal compounds supported on silica gels [13] or the application of activated carbon or alumina [14]. These methods are mainly based on the selective adsorption of organosulfur compounds, resulting in significant advantages over the catalytic desulfurization process [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total H 2 pressure was 3 MPa, reaction temperatures were 598, 623 and 648 K using two types of feedstock, a first one, with ~0.38% S (feed A) or a pre-treated feed with ~0.02% S (feed B), at a flow of 30 [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . Identical reaction conditions were used for single or stacked beds.…”
Section: Reaction Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of sulphur containing compounds in the feed B was performed by doping the diesel with the standard probe molecules DBT and 4,6-DMDBT, and subsequently comparing the retention times obtained for other molecules with literature data 30 . The degree of conversion of the refractory molecules was estimated from the obtained peak areas by chromatographic analysis.…”
Section: Activity Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%