2002
DOI: 10.1362/0267257022780705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impersonal vs. Personal Exchanges in Marketing Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…CRM is a synthesis of many existing principles from relationship marketing (Jancic and Zabkar, 2002; Sheth et al, 2000; Morgan and Hunt, 1994), and the broader issue of customer‐focused management. CRM systems provide the infrastructure that facilitates long‐term relationship building with customers.…”
Section: Benefits Of Enterprise Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRM is a synthesis of many existing principles from relationship marketing (Jancic and Zabkar, 2002; Sheth et al, 2000; Morgan and Hunt, 1994), and the broader issue of customer‐focused management. CRM systems provide the infrastructure that facilitates long‐term relationship building with customers.…”
Section: Benefits Of Enterprise Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satisfaction and affective versus calculative commitment (H3, H4) If satisfied, the party will be willing to reciprocate within an equitable exchange, thus establishing a closer and more committed relationship over time (Jancic and Zabkar 2002). Previous research demonstrates that satisfaction influences the seller's ability to build a buyer's attachment to the relationship (Johnson et al 2001;Wetzels et al 1998).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of a collaborative approach is also being realised in some business environments in the form of co-production, comarketing, co-management and co-branding arrangements (e.g. Wikström 1996;Jancic & Zabkar 2002). The development of what might be called co-personal branding will require the design of collaborative versions of personal branding audits and personal brand statements.…”
Section: Personal And/or Group Branding?mentioning
confidence: 99%