2013
DOI: 10.1097/id.0b013e3182a2b8f4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant Surface Detoxification

Abstract: Comparative studies of different detoxification methods are heterogeneous, leaving a few voids when selecting a specific technique for detoxifying the contaminated implant surface.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
56
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[113][114][115] There is no single superior antiinfective method available. 80 Surgical interventions achieved greater probing depth reduction and clinical attachment gain compared with nonsurgical interventions. 106 Access flap surgery shows resolution in only 58% of the lesions.…”
Section: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Concluded Thatmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[113][114][115] There is no single superior antiinfective method available. 80 Surgical interventions achieved greater probing depth reduction and clinical attachment gain compared with nonsurgical interventions. 106 Access flap surgery shows resolution in only 58% of the lesions.…”
Section: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Concluded Thatmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…91 Also, as there is no one superior reagent or methodology, 80 additional well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed to validate the effectiveness of various methodologies used in the surface decontamination of dental implants. 80 …”
Section: Antiinfective Measuresmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although chlorhexidine is described in the CIST protocol, 69 the most effective treatment to detoxify the implant surface has not been identified. 73 Many other surface treatments aimed at eradication of the biofilm have been described [73][74][75][76][77][78] ; these include EDTA, citric acid, hydrogen peroxide, local anesthetic, cetylpyridinium chloride, and tetracycline, among others. Mechanical debridement alone, as described in protocol A, is considered to be inadequate for this group of lesions as a result of the increased pocket depth, thus necessitating the effort at antisepsis.…”
Section: Protocol Bmentioning
confidence: 99%