2015
DOI: 10.5301/ijao.5000457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implantation of a Polycaprolactone Scaffold with Subchondral Bone Anchoring Ameliorates Nodules Formation and Other Tissue Alterations

Abstract: press-fit technique in a cartilage defect after microfracture surgery in the femoral condyle of the knee joint of the sheep and histologic and mechanical evaluation was done 4.5 months later. The first group consists of a biodegradable Polycaprolactone, PCL, scaffold with double porosity. The second test group consists of a PCL scaffold attached to a Poly(L-lactic acid), PLLA, pin anchored to the subchondral bone. Results: For both groups most of the defects (75%) exhibited the articular surface completely or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Histologically the PCL scaffold showed evidence of fibrous ingrowth, consistent with studies of PCL scaffolds. [11][12][13][14] The loss of trabecular architecture around the scaffold and anchor are also consistent with descriptions of histologic findings by Vikingsson et al 23 following PCL fixation with a pin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Histologically the PCL scaffold showed evidence of fibrous ingrowth, consistent with studies of PCL scaffolds. [11][12][13][14] The loss of trabecular architecture around the scaffold and anchor are also consistent with descriptions of histologic findings by Vikingsson et al 23 following PCL fixation with a pin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our aim was to compare in vivo cartilage regeneration by implanting scaffolds made of biostable materials of similar composition but with varying compliance, preseeded with chondrocytes or not, using a series of polyacrylate polymer and copolymer networks, previously used in in vitro studies on cell adhesion and viability (1418). In contrast to other studies (11, 19, 20), the materials we used were biocompatible, biostable polymers; thus, our results are not affected by any effect attributable to material degradation products or to loss of mechanical properties over time due to scaffold degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Cell density increases both in immature cartilage and in fibrocartilage, an increase observed in the M series with respect to the native cartilage was expected, but the increase observed in groups PLLA+CHT and M and the decrease observed in group PLLA have unclear meaning. Chondrocyte clustering was also described as a negative feature associated with degeneration in ostheoarthritic tissue (Vikingsson et al, ). Other studies interpret these clusters as a sign of immature cartilage during the healing process (Bell, Hurtig, Quenneville, Rivard, & Hoemann, ; Kumar et al, ; Kuo et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scaffolds should be non‐immunogenic and biodegradable to avoid deposits, porous to allow migration and adhesion of cells from subchondral bone, and mechanically stable to sustain the regeneration process. Bioresorbable polyesters such as polylactide (PLA) (Chu et al, ; Conoscenti et al, ) or polycaprolactone (PCL) (Martinez‐Diaz et al, ; Vikingsson et al, ) have been used previously in cartilage engineering animal models. Cell‐free strategies using PCL (Martinez‐Diaz et al, ; Vikingsson et al, ) or biostable acrylic scaffolds of varying stiffness (Sancho‐Tello et al, ; Sancho‐Tello et al, ) probed in rabbit knee models their capacity to induce the formation of histologically high‐quality tissue with the characteristics of hyaline cartilage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%