2022
DOI: 10.21723/riaee.v17i2.14369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

implementação e a consolidação dos cursos de formação de professores para a educação do campo

Abstract: Essa pesquisa se propôs a investigar, por meio de Revisão Sistemática da Literatura (RSL) nos “Periódicos CAPES”, quais os principais desafios encontrados nos processos de implementação e consolidação da Licenciatura em Educação do Campo (LEdoC). Nesse levantamento foram realizados filtros: a princípio com os descritores; depois os textos em formato de artigo revisados por pares, sendo localizados utilizando os diretórios ScIELO e DOAJ, com vistas a filtrar dados e escrutinar o objeto a ser investigado. Os res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between the subgroups in the evaluation of interests, indicated by meta‐analyses presented by Wille and De Fruyt (2023), draw attention to the fact that selecting based on interests that are already abundant in some business units only tends to continue the reproduction of stereotypes well known in the vocational context, such as the occupation of certain positions by people of the same sex (e.g., engineering as an essentially male area) or even by specific socioeconomic classes (e.g., housekeepers, as people from a lower social class and with no prospect of labor mobility) (Frabetti et al, 2015).…”
Section: Adjusting the Terms Of The Discussion On Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between the subgroups in the evaluation of interests, indicated by meta‐analyses presented by Wille and De Fruyt (2023), draw attention to the fact that selecting based on interests that are already abundant in some business units only tends to continue the reproduction of stereotypes well known in the vocational context, such as the occupation of certain positions by people of the same sex (e.g., engineering as an essentially male area) or even by specific socioeconomic classes (e.g., housekeepers, as people from a lower social class and with no prospect of labor mobility) (Frabetti et al, 2015).…”
Section: Adjusting the Terms Of The Discussion On Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%