2006
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2005.859895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a Fourth-Generation 1.8-GHz Dual-Core SPARC V9 Microprocessor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the above classification, as the sum of "control circuitry" and "operational circuitry" normally determines the "total cost" of a processor design, an inevitable trade-off between performance, cost, and flexibility arises. Figure 1 shows the Control versus Operational circuitry Ratio (COR) observation of several representative processor implementations estimated from their die photos [1,6,10,12], demonstrating a fairly accurate match between the COR value of each processor category and its well-known flexibility degree: the larger the COR, the higher the degree of flexibility. As the same trade off between performance and flexibility will inevitably occur also for any design choices taken by in-vehicle vision processors, the design of an in-vehicle vision processor is usually an optimizing search process of a compromised combination of performance and flexibility fulfillment under the severe in-vehicle cost constraints, such as consuming less than 2 W of power while hopefully achieves several hundreds of GOPS performance against as many vision applications as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Based on the above classification, as the sum of "control circuitry" and "operational circuitry" normally determines the "total cost" of a processor design, an inevitable trade-off between performance, cost, and flexibility arises. Figure 1 shows the Control versus Operational circuitry Ratio (COR) observation of several representative processor implementations estimated from their die photos [1,6,10,12], demonstrating a fairly accurate match between the COR value of each processor category and its well-known flexibility degree: the larger the COR, the higher the degree of flexibility. As the same trade off between performance and flexibility will inevitably occur also for any design choices taken by in-vehicle vision processors, the design of an in-vehicle vision processor is usually an optimizing search process of a compromised combination of performance and flexibility fulfillment under the severe in-vehicle cost constraints, such as consuming less than 2 W of power while hopefully achieves several hundreds of GOPS performance against as many vision applications as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Very high-performance microprocessors [Xanthopoulos et al 2001;Restle et al 2002;Thomson et al 2006;Hart et al 2006] address this by overdesigning uniform meshes so that small changes in load capacitance do not significantly affect the mesh skew. This, however, significantly increases the power of the entire clock network and is unwanted for high-performance, low-power ASIC designs which are the focus of this work.…”
Section: Nonuniform Advantages and Disadvantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clock structures with redundancy such as meshes (also known as grids) [Venkataraman et al 2006;Rajaram and Pan 2010;Desai et al 1996;Hu and Guthaus 2011], spines, and cross-links [Venkataraman et al 2005] are an effective way to reduce skew variation. For this reason, many microprocessor designs such as a 1.2 GHz Alpha processor [Xanthopoulos et al 2001], the Power4 [Restle et al 2002], the Power6 [Thomson et al 2006], and a dual-core SPARC V9 [Hart et al 2006] use clock meshes. Mesh-based clock distribution architectures are also supported by commercial tools in ASIC design flows [Cadence 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many microprocessor designs use clock meshes to reduce the clock skew due to variations and design mismatch, e.g., the first generation Itanium [5], 1.2GHz Alpha processor [6], Power4 [7], Dual-Core SPARC V9 [8] and the Power6 microprocessor [9]. Mesh-based clock distribution architectures are also supported by commercial tools in the ASIC design flow [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%