2018 International Symposium on Advanced Electrical and Communication Technologies (ISAECT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/isaect.2018.8618837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of an Automatic Modulation Recognition System on a Software Defined Radio Platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work the authors use a modified CNN known as a residual neural network and achieve an overall 96% accuracy, this performance is maintained until 10 dB SNR, although the authors do demonstrate that low order modulation classification accuracy reaches 100% accuracy. It is worth noting that the trend of lower order modulation scheme classification achieving higher classification accuracy is consistent across many papers [19,23,25,26]. ResNet and ModNet are therefore the best performing examples of waveform and constellation classification in hardware respectively,…”
Section: Hardware Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work the authors use a modified CNN known as a residual neural network and achieve an overall 96% accuracy, this performance is maintained until 10 dB SNR, although the authors do demonstrate that low order modulation classification accuracy reaches 100% accuracy. It is worth noting that the trend of lower order modulation scheme classification achieving higher classification accuracy is consistent across many papers [19,23,25,26]. ResNet and ModNet are therefore the best performing examples of waveform and constellation classification in hardware respectively,…”
Section: Hardware Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Papers [20] and [26] use the largest number of modulation schemes for testing, consisting of a set of 24 different schemes including high order modulations of 256, 128, and 64QAM, utilizing these high order schemes in testing will naturally introduce a penalty to the average system classification accuracy due to the previously mentioned overlap in denser constellation diagrams, in this case 5 out of 24 total modulation schemes used in these papers are of order 64 and above. Conversely, [19,24] use a maximum of 16QAM , [16,23] use a maximum of 64QAM . Due to this, these works are expected to have a higher average accuracy due to the higher order datasets used.…”
Section: Accuracy Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results obtained, our method outperforms all these modulation schemes. Keshk et al [26] Table 2 compares the proposed method with [32] for BPSK, QPSK, and 16QAM modulation schemes. Accuracy of classifiers based on Moment, Cumulant, GP-KNN, and EM-ML changes with carrier phase offset as given in [33] while the developed algorithm is independent to such phase offsets.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%