2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-011-9543-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of an X-FEM Solver for the Classical Two-Phase Stefan Problem

Abstract: The classical two-phase Stefan problem in level set formulation is considered. The implementation of a solver on triangular grids is described. Extended finite elements (X-FEM) in space and an implicit Euler method in time are used to approximate the temperature. For the level set equation, a discontinuous Galerkin (DG) and a strong stability preserving (SSP) Runge-Kutta scheme are employed. Polynomial spaces of quadratic order are used. A numerical example with a change of topology is provided, and the order … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, two methods are used. The first is the penalization method Chessa et al (2002); Bernauer and Herzog (2011);Zabaras et al (2006), which applies the melting temperature on the interface by multiplying (1b) by a very large penalization parameter β (eq. 11) and including it in the weak form (8) for intersected elements only.…”
Section: Finite Element Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, two methods are used. The first is the penalization method Chessa et al (2002); Bernauer and Herzog (2011);Zabaras et al (2006), which applies the melting temperature on the interface by multiplying (1b) by a very large penalization parameter β (eq. 11) and including it in the weak form (8) for intersected elements only.…”
Section: Finite Element Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of nodes on the interface means that we cannot apply specified values directly and an additional constraint must be added in the finite element formulation to apply the appropriate boundary condition on the interface. Bernauer and Herzog (2011) and Lagrange multiplier method Moes et al (2006); Ji and Dolbow (2004); Babuska (1973). The penalty method requires the definition of a free numerical parameter to be determined by trial and error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass flux interface boundary condition is imposed using the penalty method Chessa et al (2002); Bernauer and Herzog (2011). This technique multiplies the residual form of equation (4c) by a very large penalization parameter β and introduces it in the finite element formulation of the momentum equation.…”
Section: Stokes Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (22) is first order hyperbolic and must be stabilized to minimize the presence of oscillations in the solution Chessa et al (2002); Bernauer and Herzog (2011). The GLS method is used here Hughes et al (1989).…”
Section: Frontiers In Heat Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation