2022
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Practice as a Next Step after Going Digital: The UMC Utrecht Perspective

Abstract: Building on a growing number of pathology labs having a full digital infrastructure for pathology diagnostics, there is a growing interest in implementing artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for diagnostic purposes. This article provides an overview of the current status of the digital pathology infrastructure at the University Medical Center Utrecht and our roadmap for implementing AI algorithms in the next few years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one of the participants was a cytopathologist (who also subspecialized in other areas of anatomic pathology), which may reflect the current underrepresentation of this subspecialty in computational pathology/AI due to the challenges of generating and storing z-stacked WSIs (which may resolve with the introduction of dedicated cytology whole-slide scanners in the near future). 42 Also, as most of the participants were practicing in North America and Europe, the results of this study may reflect a predominantly North American/European perspective that differs from the perspectives of those practicing in other parts of the world. Lastly, as our study was targeted toward a specific respondent demographic, individuals from other stakeholder groups (such as pathology trainees, pathologists with little or no experience in computational pathology/AI, pathology laboratory technicians, computer scientists and others working in the computational pathology/AI space with non-medical backgrounds, physicians in other specialties, and patients) were not represented in our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only one of the participants was a cytopathologist (who also subspecialized in other areas of anatomic pathology), which may reflect the current underrepresentation of this subspecialty in computational pathology/AI due to the challenges of generating and storing z-stacked WSIs (which may resolve with the introduction of dedicated cytology whole-slide scanners in the near future). 42 Also, as most of the participants were practicing in North America and Europe, the results of this study may reflect a predominantly North American/European perspective that differs from the perspectives of those practicing in other parts of the world. Lastly, as our study was targeted toward a specific respondent demographic, individuals from other stakeholder groups (such as pathology trainees, pathologists with little or no experience in computational pathology/AI, pathology laboratory technicians, computer scientists and others working in the computational pathology/AI space with non-medical backgrounds, physicians in other specialties, and patients) were not represented in our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…34 Numerous reviews have been published on the emerging and future applications of pathology AI to cancer diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment response prediction, metastasis detection in lymph nodes, single and multiplex biomarker quantification, tumor content/cellularity assessment for molecular testing, mutation status prediction, and a multitude of other tasks in pathology. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Despite the recent progress and enthusiasm surrounding the application of AI to pathology, few algorithms are currently in routine clinical use, 37,46 with a dearth of prospective multi-center, randomized trials present evaluating the impact of these algorithms in clinical settings. 47,48 Further, ethical concerns have been raised regarding potential patient data privacy breaches, biased datasets producing systemic algorithmic bias, potential harm related to erroneous or misleading AI-generated outputs, and exacerbation of healthcare disparities due to unequal access to AI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At UMC Utrecht, we employ three high throughput Hamamatsu XR scanners from Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. (Hamamatsu City, Japan) to digitize slides 27,28 . The Sectra Picture Archiving Communication System (PACS), provided by Sectra AB (Linkoping, Sweden) is used as the image management and workflow system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hamamatsu City, Japan) to digitize slides. 27,28 The Sectra Picture Archiving Communication System (PACS), provided by Sectra AB (Linkoping, Sweden) is used as the image management and workflow system. With PACS, images of HE slides can be viewed and annotated using the integrated ruler tool, which is useful for measuring.…”
Section: Histopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high incidence of breast cancer (BC) cases poses a substantial burden on healthcare providers, including pathologists. To alleviate some of the clinical burden, decision support systems based on computer vision and machine learning can be utilised [2], including systems designed for characterization and diagnosis of BC from routine digital histopathology whole slide images (WSI) from tissue sections stained with Haematoxylin-eosin (H&E).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%