Implementation of fuzzy TOPSIS methodology in selection of procedural approach for facility layout planning

Sharma, Parveen; Singhal, Sandeep

doi:10.1007/s00170-016-8878-8

Cited by 33 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Traditionally, most approaches tackling the facilities layout planning have followed the systematic layout planning methodology (SLP) introduced by Muther [73]. A recent study concluded that this was the most appropriate approach to handle facility layout design problems [74]. Like most engineering design problems, SLP methodology is based on a hierarchical approach, starting with a block layout phase and followed by a detailed phase [75,76].…”

Section: Current Trends In the Dflp Formulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of Dynamic Facility Layout Planning as a Sustainability Strategy

Pérez-Gosende

Díaz‐Madroñero

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The facility layout design problem is significantly relevant within the business operations strategies framework and has emerged as an alternate strategy towards supply chain sustainability. However, its wide coverage in the scientific literature has focused mainly on the static planning approach and disregarded the dynamic approach, which is very useful in real-world applications. In this context, the present article offers a literature review of the dynamic facility layout problem (DFLP). First, a taxonomy of the reviewed papers is proposed based on the problem formulation current trends (related to the problem type, planning phase, planning approach, number of facilities, number of floors, number of departments, space consideration, department shape, department dimensions, department area, and materials handling configuration); the mathematical modeling approach (regarding the type of model, type of objective function, type of constraints, nature of market demand, type of data, and distance metric), and the considered solution approach. Then, the extent to which recent research into DFLP has contributed to supply chain sustainability by addressing its three performance dimensions (economic, environmental, social) is described. Finally, some future research guidelines are provided.

show abstract

Section: Current Trends In the Dflp Formulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of Dynamic Facility Layout Planning as a Sustainability Strategy

Pérez-Gosende

Díaz‐Madroñero

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tradicionalmente, la mayoría de los enfoques de solución del problema de la DP han seguido la metodología de planificación sistemática de distribución (systematic layout planning, SLP) [52]. Una investigación reciente concluyó que este era el enfoque más adecuado para manejar problemas de diseño de DP [53].…”

Section: Tabla I Estrategia De Revisión De La Literaturaunclassified

Planificación de la distribución en planta en entornos dinámicos: un estudio de revisión

Pérez-Gosende¹,

Mula

Díaz‐Madroñero

2020

Proceedings of the 18th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology: Engineering, Integrat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The facility layout problem is considered one of the most important design decisions in the framework of business operations strategies. Its proven impact on operational costs, efficiency, and productivity of manufacturing systems have made it a topic of extensive scientific discussion. However, the static planning approach has been given greater coverage in the literature, when in fact, in practice, the consideration of a dynamic or multiperiod approach is more common. In this context, this article presents a literature review regarding the dynamic facilities layout problem (DFLP) from the perspective of operations management. The revised literature allowed us to define the frames of reference, design principles, modeling approaches, resolution strategies, as well as guidelines for future research.

show abstract

“…Singh et al [32] introduced the concept of three-level AHP heuristic approach with a new normalization procedure and a new heuristic method to generate objective weights for a multi-objective facility layout issue. Sharma et al [33] applied the fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to the best selection of procedural approach for facility layout planning. Kumar et al [34] proposed a hybrid interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and decisionmaking trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method approach to figure out the hierarchal and contextual relation structure among the barriers of e-waste recycling management.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, determining how to evaluate the ELV disassembly plant layout scientifically is still a problem that needs to be solved. Generally, two types of approaches are employed to address this issue in the view of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM): 1) correlation degree assessment approaches, e.g., weighted sum [42]- [44], TOPSIS [28], [45], AHP [46] and fuzzy synthetic evaluation [33], [47], [48] and 2) the approaches DEMATEL [29], [49]. On the other hand, to our knowledge, hybrid gray correlation and fuzzy DEMATEL approaches have not been employed to solve the ELV plant facility layout problem.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

End of Life Vehicle Disassembly Plant Layout Evaluation Integrating Gray Correlation and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory

Zhang

Liu³

et al. 2020

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

End of life vehicle (ELV) is a significant renewable resource with enormous economic value and environmental value. This paper introduced a novel approach that combines the gray correlation and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) with an interactive technique in order to consider both quantitative and qualitative features simultaneously in ELV plant facility layout problem. The gray interval number of gray correlation is used as the expert's evaluation score of the impact factor of the ELV dismantling plant, DEMATEL constructs a direct impact matrix by analyzing the causal relationship between various influencing factors in the system. The proposed approach is applied to the case of a realistic ELV dismantling plant, and the evaluation framework for an ELV plant layout alternatives and design assessment analysis also conducted. The results show that it provides a systematic decision support tool and a feasible approach for evaluation of ELV disassembly plant layout alternatives.

show abstract

Implementation of fuzzy TOPSIS methodology in selection of procedural approach for facility layout planning

Cited by 33 publications

References 25 publications

Overview of Dynamic Facility Layout Planning as a Sustainability Strategy

Overview of Dynamic Facility Layout Planning as a Sustainability Strategy

Planificación de la distribución en planta en entornos dinámicos: un estudio de revisión

End of Life Vehicle Disassembly Plant Layout Evaluation Integrating Gray Correlation and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About