2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of Nash bargaining solutions with non-convexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper obtains the egalitarian bargaining solution as the long-run norm if there are intentional biases (where a deviation to a different strategy depends on the last payoff received); this result is to be contrasted with Young (1993), which obtains the Nash solution when deviations do not exhibit such a dependence. Qin et al (2019) implements selections of the Nash set (multi-valued Nash solutions) in the absence of convexity of the feasible set of utilities. Mizukami and Wakayama (2020) investigates implementation in dominant strategies and finds a negative result: along with welfarism, it is equivalent to the class of dictatorial solutions.…”
Section: Other Solutions To Pure Bargaining Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper obtains the egalitarian bargaining solution as the long-run norm if there are intentional biases (where a deviation to a different strategy depends on the last payoff received); this result is to be contrasted with Young (1993), which obtains the Nash solution when deviations do not exhibit such a dependence. Qin et al (2019) implements selections of the Nash set (multi-valued Nash solutions) in the absence of convexity of the feasible set of utilities. Mizukami and Wakayama (2020) investigates implementation in dominant strategies and finds a negative result: along with welfarism, it is equivalent to the class of dictatorial solutions.…”
Section: Other Solutions To Pure Bargaining Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%