Implementation of Rasch Model for Mapping Students’ Metacognitive Awareness

Abstract

This study aim is to map students’ metacognitive awareness in physics subjects. This research was conducted at SMAN 1 Bantarsari in 2020. A total of 112 respondents (male = 17% and female = 83%) from class XI and XII were selected using a combination of snowball techniques and convenience sampling. Students’ metacognitive physics awareness was administrated using the Physics Metacognition Inventory (PMI) and analyzed using the Rasch model. The PMI inventory consists of 26 items and uses a Likert scale of 5 ratings ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Mapping students’ physics metacognitive awareness based on the Logit Value of Person. Metacognitive awareness is classified into four levels, namely: low, medium, high, and very high levels. The results showed that more than 80% of students had metacognitive awareness at moderate and high levels. Dominant female students have metacognitive awareness at a high level and male students at a moderate level. The students’ metacognitive awareness in class XI and XII were at very high and moderate levels, respectively. The 15-16 year age group was dominant at a moderate level and the 17-18 year age group at a high level.

What do my students need? Deep analysis of student's individual cognitive ability using person diagnostic map

“…Figure 1 maps hierarchically between student abilities and item difficulty levels (Ayu et al, 2023;Thohir et al, 2021). The map is divided into two parts, namely, the left part depicts the person's condition, and the right part describes the item's condition (Sukarelawan et al, 2021). The person's location determines the level of the student's ability, and the item's location determines the item's difficulty level.…”

“…This approach provides an overview of students' general conceptual understanding at the group level (Soeharto et al, 2024;Zabidi et al, 2022) but cannot provide an individual-level overview. On the other hand, the use of the Wright map, as part of modern test theory, is currently experiencing increasing use to describe the state of students' conceptual understanding (Puspitasari et al, 2022;Sukarelawan et al, 2022). This approach offers more detailed information than the descriptive approach.…”

Study of metacognitive awareness at the individual level of students across study programs using Rasch modeling

“…The range of values given for Infit MnSq is between 0.68 and 1.53, and for Outfit MnSq, it is between 0.67 and 1.92. There is an acceptable goodness-of-fit range from 0.5 to 1.5, which is considered ideal in Rasch modeling [26], [49], [50]. In general, Infit and Outfit MnSq values within this range indicate a good fit between the items measured by the Rasch model.…”

Physical and Psychological Violence in Dating Adolescents: Who are the Victims?

“…The quality of the PPVV scale is reviewed from the person and item aspects. The violence that occurred was evaluated using the Wright map combined with the Logit Value of Person (LVP) (Ramdhan et al, 2022;Sukarelawan et al, 2022). Combining these two techniques makes it possible to map violent incidents in detail.…”