2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2016.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm II in the Multiobjective Burnable Poison Placement Optimization of KWU Pressurized Water Reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows the flowchart of SPEA-II. For mathematical and other details of the SPEA-II and hyper-parameter tuning issues, see [44][45][46].…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the flowchart of SPEA-II. For mathematical and other details of the SPEA-II and hyper-parameter tuning issues, see [44][45][46].…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm is based on the same non-domination pareto principle as NSGA-II using an evolutionary process. The fitness is calculated as a combination of the summed scores of the objectives (fitness), and the number of solutions dominated (strength) [123,124] .…”
Section: Further Multi-objective Bio-inspired Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 8, we show our results when our developed scheme was compared to SPEA-II (Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm) [49], PESA-II (Pareto Envelope-based Selection Algorithm with region-based selection) [50] and NSGA-III. Our scheme also out performs the SPEA-II and PESA-II algorithms with SPEA-II performing slightly better than PESA-II for the same block selection problem using the same parameters.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%