Implementing a faculty mentoring process to improve academic-clinical partnerships for nurse led evidence based practice and research projects

Heitschmidt, Mary; Staffileno, Beth A.; Kleinpell, Ruth

doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.04.015

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, perceived support of executive leadership was higher among collaborating sites and nearly all joint-employer sites had academic-clinical collaborations. Leadership support for collaborations has been cited in other literature (Beal, 2012;Carter et al, 2020;DeGeest et al, 2013;Heitschmidt et al, 2020) and may ultimately be the driver for strong academic-clinical…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A cross‐sectional study of United States Academic‐clinical research collaborations: Characteristics, resources, benefits and outcomes

Albert

Chipps

Klein

et al. 2020

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims:The aims of the study were to compare characteristics, resources, benefits and outcomes of academic-clinical collaborations of nursing researcher leaders from academic, clinical and joint-employer sites. Background: Few research-based publications addressed academic-clinical research collaborations. New knowledge could increase nursing and multidisciplinary research productivity, including implementation science. Design: An anonymous survey using a 40-item questionnaire. Methods: Information letters with a link to the questionnaire were emailed to United States nursing research leaders. Data were grouped by institution type: academic, clinical or joint-employer. Analyses included Kruskal-Wallis tests for ordered responses, Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical responses and Cohen's Kappa agreement statistic for expected and actual time devoted to research. STROBE guidelines were followed. Results: Of 120 respondents from academic (n = 60; 50.0%), clinical (n = 53; 41.2%)and joint-employer (n = 7; 5.8%) sites, 78.3%, 92.3% and 100%, respectively, were from metropolitan areas. Mean (SD) priority for active collaborations was higher at jointemployer sites; p = .002. Clinical sites were more likely to have directors of evidencebased practice (p = .031) and informatics (p = .008) and librarians (p = .029). Sites with collaborations were more likely to have access to research subjects (p = .008) and

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Despite literature that supports joint academic-clinical appointments (Carter et al, 2020;Heitschmidt et al, 2020), very few respondents were in institutions with joint employments. Although joint-employer site characteristics differed, over 50% were academic medical centres and all but one respondent was engaged in a research collaboration.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A cross‐sectional study of United States Academic‐clinical research collaborations: Characteristics, resources, benefits and outcomes

Albert

Chipps

Klein

et al. 2020

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a previously published article, we described aspects of our CCRS faculty mentoring process, which aims to improve collaborative initiatives throughout the system and engage students, direct care nurses, APRNs, and faculty. 6 EBP project teams gain experience while being mentored by CCRS faculty. Mentoring is an important component of their success, especially for teams conducting a project for the first time.…”

Section: Key Opportunities and Prioritiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Collaborative EBP initiatives reinforce our academic–practice partnership. In a previously published article, we described aspects of our CCRS faculty mentoring process, which aims to improve collaborative initiatives throughout the system and engage students, direct care nurses, APRNs, and faculty 6. EBP project teams gain experience while being mentored by CCRS faculty.…”

Section: Key Opportunities and Prioritiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using a Generous Leadership Model to Promote Evidence-Based Practice

Staffileno

Heitschmidt

Tucker

2022

AJN, American Journal of Nursing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How leaders at one large health system have fostered a culture of EBP.This article is part of a series about evidence-based practice (EBP) that builds on AJN's award-winning previous series-Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step-published between 2009 and 2011 (to access the series, go to https://links.lww.com/AJN/A133). This follow-up series features exemplar success stories, in which authors describe how initiatives using an implementation framework or evidence-based strategy resulted in a successful practice or program change. Column coordinators Sharon J. Tucker and Lynn Gallagher-Ford alternate in providing commentary at the end.

show abstract