2022
DOI: 10.31014/aior.1993.05.01.429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing Content-Based Instruction (CBI) on EFL Student’s Writing through Technology-Enhanced Language Teaching

Abstract: Several empirical studies of Content-Based Instruction (CBI) have concluded that this approach has positive impacts in improving language learning skills including writing in foreign language learning environments. However, many of them carried out this approach within the traditional setting; face-to-face interaction instead of the e-learning. This current study is aimed to examine the impact of CBI on EFL learner’s writing through technology-enhanced language teaching. The approach was implemented in student… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goals of instruction, the method of instruction chosen, and the capabilities of the technology available all influence how technology is incorporated into EFL instruction. In the study conducted by Sariani et al (2022), for instance, WhatsApp was favored in Content-Based Instruction to increase students' writing skills. In the study, WhatsApp chat was utilized to provide immediate and effective contact between researchers and participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goals of instruction, the method of instruction chosen, and the capabilities of the technology available all influence how technology is incorporated into EFL instruction. In the study conducted by Sariani et al (2022), for instance, WhatsApp was favored in Content-Based Instruction to increase students' writing skills. In the study, WhatsApp chat was utilized to provide immediate and effective contact between researchers and participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%