2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05159-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing continuity of midwife carer – just a friendly face? A realist evaluation

Abstract: Background: Good quality midwifery care saves the lives of women and babies. Continuity of midwife carer (CMC), a key component of good quality midwifery care, results in better clinical outcomes, higher care satisfaction and enhanced caregiver experience. However, CMC uptake has tended to be small scale or transient. We used realist evaluation in one Scottish health board to explore implementation of CMC as part of the Scottish Government 2017 maternity plan.Methods: Participatory research, quality improvemen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies to increase midwifery continuity, mainly in low-risk pregnancy, have focused on case-holding models which required significant workforce flexibility including 24-h on call [ 12 ]. These models often proved difficult to sustain beyond research or small-scale contexts in the UK [ 36 , 37 ]. The role of care- coordinator also required changes in practice from the midwives, although they were not asked to be on call for births, most volunteered to be involved and were highly invested in delivering the intervention as planned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies to increase midwifery continuity, mainly in low-risk pregnancy, have focused on case-holding models which required significant workforce flexibility including 24-h on call [ 12 ]. These models often proved difficult to sustain beyond research or small-scale contexts in the UK [ 36 , 37 ]. The role of care- coordinator also required changes in practice from the midwives, although they were not asked to be on call for births, most volunteered to be involved and were highly invested in delivering the intervention as planned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prudence is a governing virtue, suggesting that an agent would be of merit to arrive at pragmatism. An agent who leads, generates meaning, who casts light on woman-centred care points of view and actions, who shifts the direction of ideas in maternity services and who safeguards the essence and importance of womancentred care (Deering et al, 2020;McInnes et al, 2020).…”
Section: Prudencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of QCP-M in clinical sites is influenced by nurses and midwives, whose local knowledge, values, beliefs, and individual characteristics determine their interaction with the intervention. Awareness of this facilitates the successful implementation of the QCP-M within the clinical setting [34,39,41,44,45,51,54,[58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Theory Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical sites recognise and respect the knowledge [34,39,41,45,54,58,61], beliefs [36,44,54,61], and values [45] of nurses and midwives and their unique individual characteristics [41,51,[58][59][60], thereby facilitating the promotion and adoption of quality improvement initiatives [61]. QCP-M introduced into clinical sites that have supporting education and training functions, and champions/implementation leads to support them, facilitate staff engagement with evidenced-based practice programs, leading to their successful implementation and adoption [32][33][34][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]48,53,54,61].…”
Section: Theory Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%