2014
DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2014.900131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing REDD+ in Papua New Guinea: Can biodiversity indicators be effectively integrated in PNG's National Forest Inventory?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Datasets measuring changes in forest carbon emissions can be used to assess changes in biodiversity, water and soil resources. Integration of carbon and environmental objectives at the design stage, can help modulate and optimize the balance between carbon and co-benefits [44,45], help clarify monitoring needs and improve project performance.…”
Section: Integration Across Scales and Disciplines In Redd+ Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Datasets measuring changes in forest carbon emissions can be used to assess changes in biodiversity, water and soil resources. Integration of carbon and environmental objectives at the design stage, can help modulate and optimize the balance between carbon and co-benefits [44,45], help clarify monitoring needs and improve project performance.…”
Section: Integration Across Scales and Disciplines In Redd+ Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also the case for mangrove wetlands. Papua New Guinea is implementing the UN-REDD+ mechanism (the United Nations Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation plus Sustainable Forest Management, Conservation of Forests, Enhancement of carbon sinks), (Grussu et al, 2014). This aims to decrease emissions (e.g., from slash and burn deforestation) and enhance forest carbon-sequestration.…”
Section: Summary Of the Main Direct Pressures On Coastal Wetlands Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cancun Agreement provided guidance for safeguarding biodiversity by requiring that REDD+ actions do not result in the conversion of natural forests to plantations, but instead be used to incentivize the conservation of natural forests and their ecosystem services, and enhance environmental benefits (UNFCCC 2011). Although a step in the right direction, the wording was considered too general and not operational (Gardner et al 2012;Grussu et al 2014). Despite the evolution of international safeguard discussions since Cancun, safeguards for biodiversity and other non-carbon benefits remain vague (Pistorius and Reinecke 2013).…”
Section: Realizing the Delivery Of Biodiversity Co-benefits In Redd+mentioning
confidence: 99%