2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4912555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing semantically rich business vocabularies in CASE tools*)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For our SBVR-related research purposes, we developed a UML profile for SBVR Business Vocabulary and a plug-in for the CASE system MagicDraw. That solution allows modeling SBVR business vocabularies using visual diagrams [36].…”
Section: Sbvr Business Vocabularymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For our SBVR-related research purposes, we developed a UML profile for SBVR Business Vocabulary and a plug-in for the CASE system MagicDraw. That solution allows modeling SBVR business vocabularies using visual diagrams [36].…”
Section: Sbvr Business Vocabularymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This CASE system features a UML extension mechanism via UML profiling and extensibility of both the CASE system functionality and DSL engine (via API) [37], which are mandatory to support this approach. Among other components, it includes the SBVR Modeler plug-in for MagicDraw, which uses a UML profile for SBVR to enable visual modeling functionality [36], model integration solver plugin, and the SBVR editor. Aside from Model Integration profiles and other previously developed transformations, the DnD Transformations plugin also contains the library of newly developed UML UCM → SBVR BV transformations, which are introduced further in this paper.…”
Section: Architecture Of Profiles Supporting Dnd Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a partial M2M transformation specification is developed, it can be interpreted and executed by the transformation engine within the same environment where the actual visual modeling takes place. Our solution enables us to do that across different meta object facility (MOF)-based modeling languages, such as unified modeling language (UML), semantics of business vocabulary and rules (SBVR) [15,16], business process model and notation (BPMN) [17], or service-oriented architecture modeling language (SoaML) [18]. We expect them to apply to other modeling languages (e.g., systems modeling language (SysML) [19] and object-process methodology [12]) and for as long as they are implemented using UML profiles in the modeling environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UML class model was selected as the output model of our experiment. Note that it could be safely replaced with the SBVR fact model or virtually any other model being implemented as a UML profile (e.g., our research group has developed such implementation for SBVR [15]). Yet, we chose the UML class model for simplicity, because it is more established and well known in the modeling community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baseline studies are based on the use of CASE tools in business systems in general (Montini et al, 2014;Harmon, 2015;Skersys et al, 2015), on the basis of what has been observed as the need for implementation in the field of hotel business and tourism. (Maksimović et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%