Several longitudinal studies show that "the best predictor of health, wealth, and happiness in later life is not school achievement, but the number of years in schooling" (Hattie 2012, pp. 229-230). And we have known for many decades that there is a clear connection between mastery experiences and school motivation, and that this might also affect the length of schooling and school achievement. At the same time, it has been seen that it is school achievement that dominates in the public discourse, and this is most often associated with school grades in the subjects (especially in theoretical subjects). But this is a somewhat simplified and narrow understanding. School achievement actually means achievement in all school subjects, and grades only form part of the concept. This is most clearly seen at primary school level (1st-5th grade) and the intermediate level (5th-7th grade), where no grades are given at all. In fact, grades are only given for three of the ten years of compulsory school in Norway (lower secondary school). So, our general perception of school achievement is important to shed light on what school's societal mandate is, and how we can understand this in light of schooling.This brings us towards students not only learning in terms of school achievement for further education and for working life, but also in terms of life in general. In this pedagogical perspective, our semantic understanding of school achievement is important, as it must be balanced against the school having both an utdanningsoppdrag (educational assignment) and a danningsoppdrag (Bildung assignment) (Kunnskapsdepartementet (KD) 2020). It is stated intentionally that "By using varied learning arenas, school can provide students with practical and lifelong experiences that promote motivation and insights" (KD 2020, p. 16). This includes both formal and informal learning contexts, but it is easier said than done to incorporate both in teaching, adapted education and inclusion, in assessment forms, in everyday practices, and so on. One of the reasons for that is that, for example, the concept of inclusion is strongly anchored to schools' physical context, and very limited in informal learning arenas (homes, etc.) (Øen & Krumsvik 2021). The corona pandemic has shown us that this needs to be reconsidered in light of home schooling and digital teaching, which have created a situation where the main school context for teaching has actually been the home. This might raise attention to the valuing of informal learning. Sefton-Green (2013) and Lewin and Charania (2018) point out that building bridges between formal and informal learning arenas is something that digitalization has potential for, and such informal learning can be defined as "any activity involving the pursuit of understanding, knowledge or skill which occurs outside the curricula of educational insti-