2013 47th International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ccst.2013.6922039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementing trustworthy dynamic biometric signature according to the electronic signature regulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pirlo, Giuseppe, and Donato Impedovo [7], have used the optical flow technique so as to develop the system however eventually it's a computationally valuable approach. Smejkal, Vladimir, and Jindrich Kodl [9], Liu, Yishu, Zhihua rule, and Lihua rule [10], Ribeiro, Bernardete, Noel Lopes, and Joao Goncalves [11], and López-García, Mariano, et al [12] approached to a additional real time implementation with the employment of techniques like GPU, embedded systems and alternative hardwares. Wibowo, Canggih Puspo, Pitak Thumwarin, and Takenobu Matsuura [14] projected a replacement options referred to as the forward and backward variances of signature for on-line signature verification.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pirlo, Giuseppe, and Donato Impedovo [7], have used the optical flow technique so as to develop the system however eventually it's a computationally valuable approach. Smejkal, Vladimir, and Jindrich Kodl [9], Liu, Yishu, Zhihua rule, and Lihua rule [10], Ribeiro, Bernardete, Noel Lopes, and Joao Goncalves [11], and López-García, Mariano, et al [12] approached to a additional real time implementation with the employment of techniques like GPU, embedded systems and alternative hardwares. Wibowo, Canggih Puspo, Pitak Thumwarin, and Takenobu Matsuura [14] projected a replacement options referred to as the forward and backward variances of signature for on-line signature verification.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%