2016
DOI: 10.1080/00231940.2016.1152537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications for Migration and Social Connections in South-Central New Mexico Through Chemical Characterization of Carbon-Painted Ceramics and Obsidian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the rhyolite-masonry room blocks of the Lion Mountain Site Complex, Gallinas Springs Pueblo was constructed with a combination of shaped tabular sandstone and unshaped cobble masonry. The decorated ceramic assemblage is dominated by a carbon-paint ceramic type dated to AD 1240–1300; this carbon-paint type stands in stark contrast to the mineral-paint types encountered at contemporaneous sites discussed above (Ferguson et al 2016; Lincoln 2007; Winkler and Davis 1961). Whereas the Late Lion Mountain Site Complex obsidian assemblage is dominated by material from the relatively local McDaniel Tank source, the Gallinas Springs Pueblo assemblage is dominated (83%) by material from Mt.…”
Section: Lion Mountain Archaeological Project Results: Land Use Patternsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike the rhyolite-masonry room blocks of the Lion Mountain Site Complex, Gallinas Springs Pueblo was constructed with a combination of shaped tabular sandstone and unshaped cobble masonry. The decorated ceramic assemblage is dominated by a carbon-paint ceramic type dated to AD 1240–1300; this carbon-paint type stands in stark contrast to the mineral-paint types encountered at contemporaneous sites discussed above (Ferguson et al 2016; Lincoln 2007; Winkler and Davis 1961). Whereas the Late Lion Mountain Site Complex obsidian assemblage is dominated by material from the relatively local McDaniel Tank source, the Gallinas Springs Pueblo assemblage is dominated (83%) by material from Mt.…”
Section: Lion Mountain Archaeological Project Results: Land Use Patternsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Combined, the Gallinas Springs Pueblo village layout, masonry style, dominant decorated ceramic type, and obsidian source patterns are substantially different from the contemporary pattern at Late Lion Mountain Site Complex sites. These differences have led numerous researchers to speculate that Gallinas Springs Pueblo was inhabited by immigrants, possibly from the Mesa Verde area (Danson 1957; Ferguson et al 2016; Lincoln 2007; Winkler and Davis 1961). Even if not inhabited by immigrants, this site is different enough that its residents clearly were not participating in the same social, cultural, and religious practice of the residents of the Lion Mountain Site Complex.…”
Section: Lion Mountain Archaeological Project Results: Land Use Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have argued these larger-scale migrations should be considered natural outcomes of existing relationships and are better characterized as expanded versions of serial migrations or the normally occurring circulation of individuals between populations (Bernardini 2005, Schachner 2010). Still others have used analyses of ceramic and obsidian distributions to provide insight into the changing social networks throughout the Southwest and to characterize the relationships between migrant communities and local populations (Ferguson et al 2016, Mills et al 2015. These approaches both identify types of social connections that can be elucidated through archaeological investigation but also consider their role in shaping the nature of population movements in the prehistoric Southwest.…”
Section: Migration In the Prehistoric Southwestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magdalena B/w dominated the decorated pottery assemblages at Gallinas Springs Pueblo, as well as a handful of relatively smaller sites in the Gallinas Mountains (Lincoln 2007;Winkler and Davis 1961). This ceramic type appears at a limited number of sites outside of the core study area as well (Ferguson et al 2016). The term "Magdalena phase" (approximately 1240-1300 AD) has been used in reference to sites exhibiting this specific type of pottery (Ferguson et al 2016;Lincoln 2007).…”
Section: Winkler and Davis Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ceramic type appears at a limited number of sites outside of the core study area as well (Ferguson et al 2016). The term "Magdalena phase" (approximately 1240-1300 AD) has been used in reference to sites exhibiting this specific type of pottery (Ferguson et al 2016;Lincoln 2007).…”
Section: Winkler and Davis Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%