2018
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aab375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of a decrease in the precipitation area for the past and the future

Abstract: The total area with 24 hrs precipitation has shrunk by 7% between 50 • S-50 • N over the period 1998-2016, according to the satellite-based Tropical Rain Measurement Mission data. A decrease in the daily precipitation area is an indication of profound changes in the hydrological cycle, where the global rate of precipitation is balanced by the global rate of evaporation. This decrease was accompanied by increases in total precipitation, evaporation, and wet-day mean precipitation. If these trends are real, then… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Chang et al's (2016) conclusions are based on subdaily precipitation events with magnitudes ≥0.1 mm in contrast to the use of daily precipitation events of ≥12.5 mm in this study. Likewise, Benestad's (2018) findings are based on spatial aggreagtaion of daily precipitation events in contrast to gird‐scale changes in our analyses. More importantly, our findings are consistent with recent trends in the PRISM observations over the United States and therefore provide a well‐grounded perspective.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Chang et al's (2016) conclusions are based on subdaily precipitation events with magnitudes ≥0.1 mm in contrast to the use of daily precipitation events of ≥12.5 mm in this study. Likewise, Benestad's (2018) findings are based on spatial aggreagtaion of daily precipitation events in contrast to gird‐scale changes in our analyses. More importantly, our findings are consistent with recent trends in the PRISM observations over the United States and therefore provide a well‐grounded perspective.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The projected changes in the frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation events evident in our analyses is consistent with previous studies in terms of increases in the number of destructive storms and their precipitation intensities (Balling & Goodrich, 2011; Donat, Alexander, et al, 2016; Fischer & Knutti, 2016; NOAA, 2020). On the other hand, while the projected increase in the spatial extent of precipitation events is supported by a number of earlier findings (Lochbihler et al, 2019; Prein et al, 2017), numerous studies also show a potential shrinking of precipitation storms in response to enhanced radiative forcing (Benestad, 2018; Chang et al, 2016). As previously noted, the disagreement regarding the spatial extent of future extremes can potentially stem from the differences in methodologies, model simulations, and storm selection criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Global warming increases both the intensity and frequency of extreme precipitation, so to characterize the full response of extreme precipitation to global warming, either their total or both of their individual contributions must be communicated. The duration 34 and area 3537 of the extreme precipitation events may also be affected by climate change. We have shown here that extreme precipitation events occurring on average twice per decade will increase in frequency by 1–2 events per decade per degree of warming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A change in the hydrological cycle is expected to affect the vertical energy flow and the atmospheric overturning [37], and more intense rainfall is also often associated with higher cloud tops [38]. In addition, a decrease in the global area with daily rainfall implies a general decrease in f w and increase in μ [39]. Here figure 2 presented a heat map for a set of different thresholds to show that equation (1) works for a range of different thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%