2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of carbon, nitrogen and porosity on the γ→α′ martensite phase transformation and resulting hardness in PM-steel Astaloy 85Mo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking at the development of retained austenite as a function of depth, the three density states of Fe-85Mo result in similar quantities of retained austenite, which is in accordance with the elemental analysis and hardness measurements. Previous investigations have shown that the amount of retained austenite is independent of the porosity and in a comparable quantity to other works on the alloy Fe-0.85Mo [18]. In comparison, slightly higher quantities of retained austenite in depths of 0.05 mm with amounts of 15 Vol.-% are reported for Fe-1.5Mo-2Cu (Figure 6.)…”
Section: Residual Stress and Retained Austenitesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Looking at the development of retained austenite as a function of depth, the three density states of Fe-85Mo result in similar quantities of retained austenite, which is in accordance with the elemental analysis and hardness measurements. Previous investigations have shown that the amount of retained austenite is independent of the porosity and in a comparable quantity to other works on the alloy Fe-0.85Mo [18]. In comparison, slightly higher quantities of retained austenite in depths of 0.05 mm with amounts of 15 Vol.-% are reported for Fe-1.5Mo-2Cu (Figure 6.)…”
Section: Residual Stress and Retained Austenitesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…[ 30 ] Due to the dissolution of the hard carbides, the matrix becomes more and more enriched with C , which causes the hardness of the martensite to increase more and more. [ 31 ] The macrohardness of the microstructure also increases as a result. However, the increase in hardness is counteracted by the soft retained austenite remaining in the quenched structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardness of the outer rim is around 300 HV for ECR samples which indicates the presence of tempered martensite phase [2,48]. Since the carbon concentration of the ECR sample is very low (≈0.22 wt%), therefore, in this case, the hardness is expected to be low because the hardness of martensite mainly depends on the carbon concentration [2,50]. It is noticeable that the hardness value in the case of transition zones is ≈220 HV for both the samples due to the presence of lower bainite whereas, at the core or in the ferrite-pearlite region it is below 200 HV in the case of the plain sample and slightly higher for the ECR sample.…”
Section: Hardness Profilementioning
confidence: 99%