2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02497-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of left bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New LBBB occurred in 3.3% of patients in this large regional STEMI system (consistent with previous reports 0.5–6.7%) and therefore represents an important clinical subset. 1618,2230 Patients with new LBBB were older, more likely to be women and were more likely to have previous coronary artery disease (previous MI, PCI and CABG) findings consistent with previous reports. 17,18,2330 The angiographic data presented here represent the largest report to date in patients with new LBBB, and document an acute culprit lesion in 54%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…New LBBB occurred in 3.3% of patients in this large regional STEMI system (consistent with previous reports 0.5–6.7%) and therefore represents an important clinical subset. 1618,2230 Patients with new LBBB were older, more likely to be women and were more likely to have previous coronary artery disease (previous MI, PCI and CABG) findings consistent with previous reports. 17,18,2330 The angiographic data presented here represent the largest report to date in patients with new LBBB, and document an acute culprit lesion in 54%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…1618,2230 Patients with new LBBB were older, more likely to be women and were more likely to have previous coronary artery disease (previous MI, PCI and CABG) findings consistent with previous reports. 17,18,2330 The angiographic data presented here represent the largest report to date in patients with new LBBB, and document an acute culprit lesion in 54%. 17,22,23,2830 Mortality was higher for new LBBB patients at 1 year even after adjustment for the differences in comorbidities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8,[23][24][25][26][27] Of concern is that these patients may be exposed to the dangers of thrombolytics when they are experiencing either unstable angina or a nonYQ-wave AMI. 28 The question of when to treat patients with an LBBB and suspected AMI has long been of concern and precedes the thrombolytic era. [23][24][25] Over time, various strategies for using the ECG to identify which patients with LBBB were experiencing AMI have been proposed.…”
Section: Determining Presence Of Ami With Lbbb: a Challenging Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, although the criteria and the algorithm cannot be used to rule out MI, it can help to rule it in. Patients with an acute MI and LBBB have a high mortality rate, but this is significantly related to age and comorbidities [22][23][24]. Thus, these markers should be used together with the clinical findings because the ECG markers alone miss acute MI in many patients who would benefit from aggressive Table 3 Application of ST-segment criteria for the diagnosis of AMI in the 300 patients with LBBB at randomization from Wong and colleagues [4] Table 2 Odds ratios and scores for independent electrocardiographic criteria from Sgarbossa and colleagues [1] Criterion…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of the Sgarbossa Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%