“…In terms of neoadjuvant RT dose, wide individual and institutional variability exists, 19 with some centers using 45 Gy, previously established in phase II and III cooperative group trials, [1][2][3]5 while others standardly employ dose escalation in the neoadjuvant setting. 4,20 As such, NCRT dose and TI to surgery are often determined by the physician and/or institutional preference, and they are not currently based on high-level evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, however, radiation dose did not independently predict of OS or postoperative mortality in this analysis. While radiation dose escalation in the neoadjuvant setting can improve the rate of neoadjuvant nodal clearance, 4,11 and while such higher radiation doses have led to notable survival times for trimodality patients at experienced centers, we recommend dose escalation above 50.4 Gy when treating on a clinical trial or at high volume thoracic centers with surgeons experienced with operating following higher neoadjuvant RT doses, as therapy at high volume centers correlates with superior OS for NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiation 28 and for patients with other thoracic malignancies treated with TMT. 29 Several limitations to our analysis exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neoadjuvant therapy can help achieve negative-margin resections, downstage the type of surgery needed, and even increase the rates of pathological mediastinal downstaging, which correlates with improvements in overall survival (OS). 4 Although surgery after NCRT can improve progression-free survival (PFS) rates, this has not translated into an OS benefit to date. In phase III randomized prospective clinical trial, the benefit in PFS reported by Albain et al 5 was likely offset by a 26% postoperative mortality rate in pneumonectomy patients, leading to a lack of improved OS in the overall trimodality cohort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 20.8% of patients with surgery >66 days received a radiation dose >60 Gy versus 8.6% in the surgery ≤66 days (p < 0.001). Having treatment with higher radiation dose 50 4. 60 Gy (HR 1.62 [1.22-2.15]; p < 0.001) and >60 Gy (HR 3.64 Note: Numbers might not sum to 100.0% due to rounding.…”
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
“…In terms of neoadjuvant RT dose, wide individual and institutional variability exists, 19 with some centers using 45 Gy, previously established in phase II and III cooperative group trials, [1][2][3]5 while others standardly employ dose escalation in the neoadjuvant setting. 4,20 As such, NCRT dose and TI to surgery are often determined by the physician and/or institutional preference, and they are not currently based on high-level evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, however, radiation dose did not independently predict of OS or postoperative mortality in this analysis. While radiation dose escalation in the neoadjuvant setting can improve the rate of neoadjuvant nodal clearance, 4,11 and while such higher radiation doses have led to notable survival times for trimodality patients at experienced centers, we recommend dose escalation above 50.4 Gy when treating on a clinical trial or at high volume thoracic centers with surgeons experienced with operating following higher neoadjuvant RT doses, as therapy at high volume centers correlates with superior OS for NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiation 28 and for patients with other thoracic malignancies treated with TMT. 29 Several limitations to our analysis exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neoadjuvant therapy can help achieve negative-margin resections, downstage the type of surgery needed, and even increase the rates of pathological mediastinal downstaging, which correlates with improvements in overall survival (OS). 4 Although surgery after NCRT can improve progression-free survival (PFS) rates, this has not translated into an OS benefit to date. In phase III randomized prospective clinical trial, the benefit in PFS reported by Albain et al 5 was likely offset by a 26% postoperative mortality rate in pneumonectomy patients, leading to a lack of improved OS in the overall trimodality cohort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 20.8% of patients with surgery >66 days received a radiation dose >60 Gy versus 8.6% in the surgery ≤66 days (p < 0.001). Having treatment with higher radiation dose 50 4. 60 Gy (HR 1.62 [1.22-2.15]; p < 0.001) and >60 Gy (HR 3.64 Note: Numbers might not sum to 100.0% due to rounding.…”
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
“…Despite the impressive pathological remission rate of the primary tumor, comprehensive radiologic and pathologic analysis of the achieved mediastinal lymph node clearance (MC) was not described. A prognostic role of MC after induction therapy in resected node positive NSCLC is well established [2][3][4]. There is also evidence that residual nodal disease after multimodal induction has a negative impact on progression-free and overall survival.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.