2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of reserve size and forest connectivity for the conservation of wood-inhabiting fungi in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Abrego et al. , Buse et al. ) on diversity of saproxylic taxa, ours is the first to estimate the interaction effect of patch size and habitat amount in the local landscape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…, Abrego et al. , Buse et al. ) on diversity of saproxylic taxa, ours is the first to estimate the interaction effect of patch size and habitat amount in the local landscape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…) and the size and connectivity of forest reserves (Abrego et al . ) alter fungal phenology. Furthermore, knowledge of long‐term priority effects and their joint regulation by top‐down and bottom‐up forces may help to design effective reintroduction of threatened fungal species for conservation (Abrego et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have increased our understanding of the ecology of wood-inhabiting fungi, and have generally shown that habitat abundance, habitat quality and forest fragmentation influence fungal communities in complex ways, and have confirmed that some of the older indicator schemes purely based on expert opinion make sense as tools to identify sites minimally influenced by fragmentation and timber extraction (e.g. Penttilä et al 2006;Nordén et al 2007;Abrego et al 2015).…”
Section: Critique and Testing Of Proposed Surrogate Schemesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…assessing fungi as potential umbrellas or focal species, often without stating this explicitly. These studies have analyzed the effects of silvicultural management intensity (Müller et al 2007), variety of woody debris (Abrego & Salcedo 2013) and forest fragmentation (Sverdrup-Thygeson & Lindenmayer 2003;Penttilä et al 2006;Nordén et al 2013;Abrego et al 2015). They have increased our understanding of the ecology of wood-inhabiting fungi, and have generally shown that habitat abundance, habitat quality and forest fragmentation influence fungal communities in complex ways, and have confirmed that some of the older indicator schemes purely based on expert opinion make sense as tools to identify sites minimally influenced by fragmentation and timber extraction (e.g.…”
Section: Critique and Testing Of Proposed Surrogate Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%