Implications of the Private Property Right to the Community Forest Businesses Formalization through the Certification Policy

Nugroho, Bramasto; Tiryana, Tatang

doi:10.7226/jtfm.19.3.178

Cited by 7 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Community forests are planted mostly on land with clear proofs of ownership in some form (Nugroho et al 2013). Community forests in Nusapati village was funded by the government.…”

Section: Forests In Nusapati Villagementioning

confidence: 99%

Social capital of community forest management on Nusapati Village, Mempawah District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Roslinda E, Ekyastuti E, Kartikawati SM. 2017. Social capital of community forest management on Nusapati Village, Mempawah District, West Kalimantan,. Community forest management has been recognized over the past two decades as a potential approach for achieving forest sustainability. In Indonesia, community forestry was developed by a government program with limited funds. Community forestry in Nusapati village was one of many successful community forest programs. The aim of this study was to explore how social capital developed in Nusapati community relating to community forest management was developed and reinforced. The survey method was used in this research. Data collection was undertaken through general field observation, key informant interviews, and semi-structured respondent interviews with a questionnaire. The results show that social capital was significantly correlated to trust, social norms, and social networks in the development of community forestry. This study concludes that social capital of Nusapati community is strong, which suggest that government intervention through development programs should take social capital into consideration.

show abstract

“…Community forests are planted mostly on land with clear proofs of ownership in some form (Nugroho et al 2013). Community forests in Nusapati village was funded by the government.…”

Section: Forests In Nusapati Villagementioning

confidence: 99%

Social capital of community forest management on Nusapati Village, Mempawah District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Syahadat and Effendi (2007) menyebutkan bahwa kayu rakyat adalah hasil hutan yang diperoleh dari lahan milik sendiri, maka pengolahan dan pemanfaatan hasil hutan sepenuhnya menjadi hak milik mereka, sedangkan fungsi pemerintah dalam hal ini hanya melakukan pembinaan untuk menjamin kelestarian hutan. Hal ini sejalan dengan Nugroho and Tiryana (2013) yang menyatakan bahwa hutan rakyat kepemilikannya bersifat pribadi milik rakyat atau masyarakat, sehingga hak pengelolaanya juga menjadi domain pemiliknya secara utuh. Sementara kelembagaan pemasaran berdasarkan dimensi aturan mainnya termasuk dalam kondisi sedang (cukup efektif).…”

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasan Efektivitas Kelembagaanunclassified

“…Permasalahan yang ada dalam subsistem produksi, pemasaran, dan pengolahan sangat berhubungan dengan persoalan penataan kelembagaan yang memerlukan penelitian yang seksama dan aplikatif (Hardjanto, Hero, & Trison, 2012). Pada dasarnya, kelembagaan dibangun untuk mencegah peluang terjadinya perilaku opportunistik, menekan perilaku rent seeking dan free riding behaviour serta meningkatkan pertukaran informasi antar pihak yang berhubungan sehingga menekan biaya koordinasi (Eggertson, 1990) dalam Nugroho and Tiryana (2013). Pada tiga dekade terakhir, hutan rakyat menjadi prioritas utama dalam penyusunan kebijakan kehutanan Gauld (2000) dalam Maryudi et al (2012).…”

unclassified

The Effectiveness of Private Forest Institutional and Policy in Banjarnegara and Banyumas Regency

Fauziyah

Sanudin

2017

j. wasian

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas kelembagaan dan kebijakan hutan rakyat. Penelitian dilakukan di Kabupaten Banjarnegara dan Kabupaten Banyumas pada bulan Agustus 2012 sampai dengan Mei 2013. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah wawancara terstruktur, wawancara terbuka serta Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Penilaian terhadap efektivitas kelembagaan dilakukan terhadap kelembagaan pemerintah, kelembagaan pemasaran, dan kelembagaan kelompok tani dengan menggunakan indikator yang direkomendasikan yaitu: 1) prinsip batas, 2) distribusi manfaat, 3) pengaturan pilihan kolektif, 4) kegiatan bersifat memonitor, 5) pemberian sanksi atas pelanggaran, 6) mekanisme penyelesaian konflik, dan 7) pengorganisasian hak kepemilikan. Sementara efektivitas kebijakan, diukur dengan menggunakan empat sudut pandang yakni ketepatan kebijakan, ketepatan pelaksana kebijakan, ketepatan target kebijakan, dan ketepatan lingkungan kebijakan. Data yang dikumpulkan diolah dengan menggunakan skala likert dan dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas kelembagaan di Kabupaten Banjarnegara maupun Kabupaten Banyumas dalam kondisi sedang (cukup efektif). Kebijakan di Kabupaten Banjarnegara dinilai efektif dilihat dari sudut pandang ketepatan kebijakan dan ketepatan lingkungan, sedangkan kebijakan di Kabupaten Banyumas dinilai efektif dilihat dari sudut ketepatan target dan ketepatan lingkungan. Perbedaan penilaian ini disebabkan oleh perbedaan kebijakan atau program di setiap lokasi sesuai dengan kondisi dan keinginan masyarakat. Kata kunci: efektivitas, hutan rakyat, kelembagaan, kebijakan ABSTRACT This research aimed to analyze the effectiveness of institusional and policy on private forest. The research was conducted in Banjarnegara and Banyumas Regency in August 2012 -May 2013. The methods used in this study are structured interview, open interview and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Assessment of institutional effectiveness was done to government institutional, marketing institututional, and farmer institutional using recommended indicator namely: 1) user and resource boundaries, 2) appropriation and provision, 3) collective-choice arrangements, 4) monitoring, 5) graduated sanctions, 6) conflict-resolution mechanisms, and 7) recognition of appropriators

show abstract

“…The economic benefits contribute to farmer income (Hardjanto 2001;Darusman & Hardjanto 2006), while environmental benefits, e.g., maintaining the water source discharge (Widarti 2015) benefited by the wider community. Main motivation of the smallholder in developing the forests, especially in Java Island, is economic reasons (Lastini 2012;Nugroho & Tiryana 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Possibility of Harnessing Social Capital to Support the Development of Payment for Environmental Services in Small-Scale Forests: A Case of Jatigede Catchment Area

Parlinah

Nugroho

Saleh

et al. 2018

jtfm

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of social capital has gained attention as a source of support in implementing Payment for Environmental Services (PES). Environmental services, in the context of better water yields in watersheds, is affected by good land cover conditions of forests including small-scale private owned forests. Although some research results indicate that private owned forests are more economic oriented than environmental functions, but its existing social capital can be harnessed to implement PES in small-scale forests. The aim of this study was to analyze the potential of social capital as a source of support in the implementation of PES. The research was conducted by survey method. This research revealeds that the level of trust in local community leaders is very high. This role models can be an key entry point for realizing the PES scheme by strengthening the common knowledge of environmental benefits of small-scale forests and strengthen community norms related to the protection of water resources. Leadership and networking capabilities of the community institution leader give a real influence in collaboration between groups.

show abstract

Implications of the Private Property Right to the Community Forest Businesses Formalization through the Certification Policy

Abstract: This study aimed to analyze the implication of formalization of community forest business efforts through mandatory timber legality certification policy. Field survey was conducted in March-April 2012

Cited by 7 publications

References 12 publications

Social capital of community forest management on Nusapati Village, Mempawah District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

Social capital of community forest management on Nusapati Village, Mempawah District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

The Effectiveness of Private Forest Institutional and Policy in Banjarnegara and Banyumas Regency

Possibility of Harnessing Social Capital to Support the Development of Payment for Environmental Services in Small-Scale Forests: A Case of Jatigede Catchment Area

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About