2018
DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.24.2.70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possibility of Harnessing Social Capital to Support the Development of Payment for Environmental Services in Small-Scale Forests: A Case of Jatigede Catchment Area

Abstract: The concept of social capital has gained attention as a source of support in implementing Payment for Environmental Services (PES). Environmental services, in the context of better water yields in watersheds, is affected by good land cover conditions of forests including small-scale private owned forests. Although some research results indicate that private owned forests are more economic oriented than environmental functions, but its existing social capital can be harnessed to implement PES in small-scale for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Parlinah et al (2018), unwritten laws are more effectively applied in terms of forest reservation and preservation. Roslinda et al (2017), stated that community understands the written rules as part of its forest management.…”
Section: Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Parlinah et al (2018), unwritten laws are more effectively applied in terms of forest reservation and preservation. Roslinda et al (2017), stated that community understands the written rules as part of its forest management.…”
Section: Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high level of trust is due to religious values which comprise of politeness, harmony, and honesty. It is also based on mutual trust and cooperation in the community (Parlinah et al 2018) which makes it easier for members to mobilize resources and also make institutional modifications as an effort to redefine the rules (Kusumastuti 2015). Interaction is repeatedly conducted to determine various problems and provide adequate time to help build personal and organizational trust (Schluter and Koch 2011).…”
Section: Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%