2013
DOI: 10.17118/11143/10194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit comparative law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They threw into question the implicit teleology—the confidence in a scientific progression of legal knowledge toward a rational and ideal ordering of all societies—that had been part of the modern comparative project since its founding in the late nineteenth century (Frankenberg 2016: 45–46; Fournier 2018). Methodologically, they shifted the focus away from comparing the terms of a closed set of legal orders to the challenge of how to maneuver in a normatively diverse world (Macdonald and Glover 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They threw into question the implicit teleology—the confidence in a scientific progression of legal knowledge toward a rational and ideal ordering of all societies—that had been part of the modern comparative project since its founding in the late nineteenth century (Frankenberg 2016: 45–46; Fournier 2018). Methodologically, they shifted the focus away from comparing the terms of a closed set of legal orders to the challenge of how to maneuver in a normatively diverse world (Macdonald and Glover 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%