2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of initial stress for abdominal aortic aneurysm wall motion: Dynamic MRI validated finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the recent paper of Merkx et al (2009), the wall displacements on the aneurysmatic abdominal aorta obtained via dynamic MRI and those computed via the FEM were compared.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent paper of Merkx et al (2009), the wall displacements on the aneurysmatic abdominal aorta obtained via dynamic MRI and those computed via the FEM were compared.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in [21], it is necessary for accurate AAA biomechanical modeling to recover the zero-pressure state configuration of the vessel wall, in order to improve wall distensibility estimation. A similar observation was made in the FSI analysis presented in [36], where both vessel wall deformation and blood flow characteristics were affected when the measured and not the zero-pressure state geometry of a carotid bifurcation was used in the FSI analysis.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for high numerical simulation accuracy, it is important for the analyst to incorporate into the biomechanical model all necessary information including any pre-stressing of the solid structure. For example, as reported by recent cardiovascular studies 25,38 directly incorporating the original scanned geometry of an artery/vein into fluid-structure interaction simulations can give inaccurate predictions of the haemodynamics and the vascular biomechanical response. In addition, for pure structural analysis of a blood vessel wall at the full physiological pressure load, incorrect wall distensibility and stress distributions will be predicted if erroneous initial unstressed conditions are assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%