2012
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of multi-modal approaches to effectively identify cataract cases from electronic health records

Abstract: We have demonstrated that algorithms to identify and characterize cataracts can be developed utilizing data collected via the EHR. These algorithms provide a high level of accuracy even when implemented across multiple EHRs and institutional boundaries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
86
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach has led to the development of several validated algorithms to identify individuals with specific phenotypes (ie, EHR phenotyping algorithms). [22][23][24][25][26] Many of these studies have also demonstrated the ability to share EHR phenotyping algorithms among multiple institutions, 21 22 26 26a although they usually develop and validate an algorithm at one institution before implementation at other sites. In contrast, in this study, two institutions (Columbia University (CU) and Mayo Clinic (Mayo)) developed DILI EHR phenotyping algorithms separately from one another with project goals and disease case definitions informed by different organizations (eMERGE/iSAEC and DILIN, respectively).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has led to the development of several validated algorithms to identify individuals with specific phenotypes (ie, EHR phenotyping algorithms). [22][23][24][25][26] Many of these studies have also demonstrated the ability to share EHR phenotyping algorithms among multiple institutions, 21 22 26 26a although they usually develop and validate an algorithm at one institution before implementation at other sites. In contrast, in this study, two institutions (Columbia University (CU) and Mayo Clinic (Mayo)) developed DILI EHR phenotyping algorithms separately from one another with project goals and disease case definitions informed by different organizations (eMERGE/iSAEC and DILIN, respectively).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through carefully defining phenotypes, and using deployable algorithms that combine multiple sources of information in the EHR, cases and controls can be defined for association studies, such as defining age-related cataract cases and controls [1,2]. The Marshfield Personalized Medicine Research Project Biobank (Marshfield PMRP) and linked EHR, used for the study described herein, is one such resource [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RDW data from 1979 through 2011, including diagnoses, procedures, laboratory results, observations, and medications for patients residing in a 22 ZIP Code area, were de-identified and made available for this study. The phenotypes used in this investigation were selected based on the availability of manually validated (case-control status) cohorts and include: acute myocardial infarction, acute liver failure, atrial fibrillation, cataract, congestive heart failure, dementia, type 2 diabetes, diabetic retinopathy and deep vein thrombosis [24,25,28]. The RDW was used to select training cohorts for each phenotype.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This knowledge coupled with our past phenotyping experience [28] prompted the use of ICD-9 codes as a possible surrogate to identify potential positive (POS) training examples for model building. A sampling frame of patients with at least 15–20 ICD-9 codes spanning multiple days was used to define the surrogate POS cohort.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%