Livestock Epigenetics 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781119949930.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imprinting in Genome Analysis: Modeling Parent‐Of‐Origin Effects in QTL Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problems caused by PofO on genome-wide association (GWA) analyses has been discussed in detail by Rowe et al (2012) and it is obvious that this remains challenging, as the recent standard approach for fine mapping using dense SNPs may not work well. Typically, GWA studies regress the phenotype on the number of (minor) alleles present at the locus, however, with polar overdominance and an allele frequency approaching 0.5, the regression of a trait showing polar overdominance on allele count will be close to zero (see Rowe et al, 2012). Hence standard GWA analyses miss the effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problems caused by PofO on genome-wide association (GWA) analyses has been discussed in detail by Rowe et al (2012) and it is obvious that this remains challenging, as the recent standard approach for fine mapping using dense SNPs may not work well. Typically, GWA studies regress the phenotype on the number of (minor) alleles present at the locus, however, with polar overdominance and an allele frequency approaching 0.5, the regression of a trait showing polar overdominance on allele count will be close to zero (see Rowe et al, 2012). Hence standard GWA analyses miss the effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence standard GWA analyses miss the effect. To overcome this problem, one would need phased haplotypes, that is knowledge of the PofO, and specifically fit phased-haplotype-derived genotype class in the analysis, as suggested earlier (Rowe et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we show this decomposition can be written in a mathematically equivalent way that makes its biological interpretation clearer. Earlier work on partitioning kinship matrices into maternal and paternal components is described in ( Rowe et al 2009 , 2011 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulae are given in 7 and are not repeated here (the decomposition for SNPs given here is new). Earlier work on partitioning kinship matrices into maternal and paternal components is described in 11,47 . The important point is that matrices , can be constructed, representing maternal and paternal genotype or haplotype contributions as required.…”
Section: Parent-of-origin Heritability In the Hs Ratsmentioning
confidence: 99%