2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2901013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Algorithm of Radar Pulse Repetition Interval Deinterleaving Based on Pulse Correlation

Abstract: In the electromagnetic space, a single channel radar receiver will often intercept several periodic pulse trains radiating from the surrounding emitters simultaneously. The aim of radar pulse deinterleaving is to sort out the pulses coming from different emitters. Most traditional pulse repetition interval (PRI) deinterleaving methods are easy to sort out the pulses with small PRI fluctuations but difficult in dealing with relatively bigger fluctuation or staggered PRIs. In addition, this searching procedure c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the validation results, the threshold in ( 6) is set to be µ T = 0.5, and the threshold in ( 7) is set to be 5 times the root mean square (RMS) of the probability p t (j) i+1 |∆ i+1 ; s i along the time axis excluding the pulse locations (This threshold is set like this because in normal Gaussian distributions, the variables has an amplitude smaller than 5 times the RMS with approximate 100% probability.). When training the pulse group autoencoder, the training dataset is expanded based on the observed pulse groups according to (14). Assume that a particular observed pulse group contains J pulses, the inputoutput pair of the autoencoder of (x, y) is first duplicated by J times.…”
Section: Simulation and Analyses A Model Establishing And Simulation Parameter Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the validation results, the threshold in ( 6) is set to be µ T = 0.5, and the threshold in ( 7) is set to be 5 times the root mean square (RMS) of the probability p t (j) i+1 |∆ i+1 ; s i along the time axis excluding the pulse locations (This threshold is set like this because in normal Gaussian distributions, the variables has an amplitude smaller than 5 times the RMS with approximate 100% probability.). When training the pulse group autoencoder, the training dataset is expanded based on the observed pulse groups according to (14). Assume that a particular observed pulse group contains J pulses, the inputoutput pair of the autoencoder of (x, y) is first duplicated by J times.…”
Section: Simulation and Analyses A Model Establishing And Simulation Parameter Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cal operations required by this algorithm in the modern real-time systems will be extremely difficult. The computational complexity of the algorithm described in [20] is lower, but, according to its authors, the performance of this algorithm rapidly degrades with the increasing proportion of the missed pulses. Thus, even at 5 % of the omissions, the algorithm incorrectly classifies more than 10 % of the pulses.…”
Section: Probability Of Pulse Overlap As a Quantitative Indicator Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signal sorting technology is mainly divided into pulse repetition interval (PRI) analysis and feature clustering [2]- [5]. Among them, the sorting algorithm based on PRI is mainly divided into two types: statistical histogram algorithm (cumulative difference histogram CDIF, sequence difference histogram SDIF) and sequence search method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%