2003
DOI: 10.1080/01431160304998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data using modified prior probabilities in large and complex landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The categories used to analyze the land-cover changes detected were chosen based on recent landcover studies in northern Costa Rica (Pedroni 2003). Five forest categories were used for change detection analyses, including: (1) natural forest, i. e., closed canopy or selectively logged old-growth forest and natural palm swamps; (2) a charral phase of native shrub and herbaceous regeneration; (3) secondary forest dominated by regenerated native trees aged 15-20 yr; (4) tree plantations composed mainly of traditional single species exotic or native reforestation; and (5) riparian forest, i.e., linear forest arrangements along > second-order streams.…”
Section: Forest and Land-cover Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categories used to analyze the land-cover changes detected were chosen based on recent landcover studies in northern Costa Rica (Pedroni 2003). Five forest categories were used for change detection analyses, including: (1) natural forest, i. e., closed canopy or selectively logged old-growth forest and natural palm swamps; (2) a charral phase of native shrub and herbaceous regeneration; (3) secondary forest dominated by regenerated native trees aged 15-20 yr; (4) tree plantations composed mainly of traditional single species exotic or native reforestation; and (5) riparian forest, i.e., linear forest arrangements along > second-order streams.…”
Section: Forest and Land-cover Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsurprisingly, it is one of the most commonly used classification methods in remote sensing studies of tropical forests (Trisurat et al 2000, Pedroni 2003, Thenkabail et al 2004). The k-nn method has been tested in the analysis of tropical vegetation only in papers I, II and IV, but is employed widely and also in operative use in satellite-imagebased forest inventories (Tomppo 1996, Nilsson 1997, Tomppo et al 1999, Gjertsen et al 2000, Franco-Lopez et al 2001, Tomppo et al 2001, Reese et al 2003, McInerney et al 2005, Koukal et al 2007, McRoberts et al 2007) and in land cover and non-forest/forest classifications (Franco-Lopez et al 2001, Haapanen et al 2004 in the boreal and temperate zone.…”
Section: Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land-cover mapping is one of the most common applications of remote sensing, whether at a global scale (Bartholome & Belward 2005, Mayaux et al 2005), a continental scale (Mayaux et al 1999, Roberts et al 2003, Eva et al 2004, Mayaux et al 2004, Stibig et al 2007) or a regional one (Pedroni 2003). In these studies the separation of vegetation classes was mainly based on the physiognomic characteristics of forests, on macro-climatic conditions and on topography.…”
Section: Vegetation Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No classification is completed until its accuracy has been assessed [18]. In this context, the "accuracy" means the level of agreement between labels assigned by the classifier and the class allocations on the ground collected by the user as test data.…”
Section: Accuracy Of Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, maximum likelihood classifier is performed after specifying a set of training samples and a certain classification algorithm. The maximum likelihood decision rule is based on a normalized (Gaussian) estimate of the probability density function of each class [18]. This method quantitatively evaluates both the variance and covariance of the category spectral response patterns when classifying an unknown pixel.…”
Section: Supervised Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%