“…Until now, efforts have been devoted to alleviate intrinsic instability of CsPbIBr 2 -based devices such as film growth regulation, ,,, composition control, ,, additive engineering, ,,, and top or buried interface modification. ,,, Notably, polymers with functional groups have been actively used as additives in PSCs, such as typical poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), polyurethane (PU), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), and poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) P(VDF-TrFE) . Similar to small-molecule additives, due to their high molecular weight and specific functional groups, the polymer additives not only serve as the template and retardant for perovskite growth but also chelate the dangling bonds on the defective surface through Lewis acid–base interaction, thereby minimizing the structural disorders and interfacial trap states. ,, Furthermore, the incorporation of some polymers, such as PEG, PVP, and PU, can enable the self-healing ability of perovskite films because of the interaction between the polymer and moisture or the presence of dynamic disulfide bond at high temperatures. ,, In addition, hydrophobically functionalized polymers can protect crystal grains against moisture and oxygen, thereby prolonging device stability. In this fashion, doping polymer is also expected to be important for the improved PCE and long-term stability of CsPbIBr 2 -based PSCs.…”