2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Differential Diagnosis of Breast Masses on Ultrasonographic Images with a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Determining Histological Classifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multiple-discriminant analysis with the nine features was employed to distinguish among the four different types of histological classifications. We also confirmed the clinicians’ classification performances were substantially improved by using our CADx scheme in an observer study [ 7 ]. However, the unsatisfactory classification accuracy of our CADx scheme made it unfit to apply in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A multiple-discriminant analysis with the nine features was employed to distinguish among the four different types of histological classifications. We also confirmed the clinicians’ classification performances were substantially improved by using our CADx scheme in an observer study [ 7 ]. However, the unsatisfactory classification accuracy of our CADx scheme made it unfit to apply in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Several studies found that radiologists’ classification performance of lung nodules improved when they were assisted that provided a malignancy likelihood [20,21]. Similar observations were also reported for breast mass classification [22,23]. This shows that estimating the uncertainty of the automated model can be useful; however, it has been often overlooked when designing deep neural networks (DNN) models for health-care.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The ability of CAD to improve the radiologists' performances was based on providing a useful reference for radiologists either by consistently extracting the quantitative features or by uniformly estimating the malignancy probability. Some studies 20,21 have suggested that the role of CAD might be to serve as an alternative to double reading by radiologists. In clinical practice, variability in the second human reader exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%