2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5026509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved electrical conductivity of poly(ethylene oxide) nanofibers using multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Abstract: Highly conductive nanofibers with 1570 S/m were obtained from an electrospun solution of polymer containing multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Homogeneous dispersion of high concentrations of MWCNTs was achieved by attaching poly(styrenesulfonic acid graft aniline) (PSS-g-ANI), an amphiphilic surfactant, to the MWCNT surface. The hydrophilic sulfonic acid group facilitated the dissolution of PSS-g-ANI-grafted MWCNTs in a polyethylene oxide (PEO) solution up to 6.7 wt% MWCNT. To our knowledge, this is the h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For our system, the linear current–voltage ( I – V ) curves confirmed the ohmic behavior of these samples. , For a single fiber connecting the gold contacts, electrical conductivity (σ) was obtained by using the following eq single−fiber 0.25em conductivity , 0.25em σ = 1 ρ = I V × L A = I V π ( R 2 L ) where A , I , V , L , and R are the fiber cross-sectional area, current, voltage, length, and radius of fiber, respectively. As discussed above, all fibers were considered cylindrical (Figure S8).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For our system, the linear current–voltage ( I – V ) curves confirmed the ohmic behavior of these samples. , For a single fiber connecting the gold contacts, electrical conductivity (σ) was obtained by using the following eq single−fiber 0.25em conductivity , 0.25em σ = 1 ρ = I V × L A = I V π ( R 2 L ) where A , I , V , L , and R are the fiber cross-sectional area, current, voltage, length, and radius of fiber, respectively. As discussed above, all fibers were considered cylindrical (Figure S8).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For our system, the linear current−voltage (I−V) curves confirmed the ohmic behavior of these samples. 22,72 For a single fiber connecting the gold contacts, electrical conductivity (σ) was obtained by using the following eq 1 ( )…”
Section: Acsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained electrical conductivity of the two types of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and graphite was 2.21 × 10 3 ± 46.25, 1.50 × 10 3 ± 13.46 and 1.69 × 10 4 ± 240.19 S cm −1 , consistent with the reported values from previous work. [27][28][29] It may be noted that the electrical conductivity of the synthesized PEDOT:PSS powder is in the same range as that of graphite but one order of magnitude greater than that of multi-walled carbon nanotubes.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Researchers made composite materials from this simple method, producing conductive nanofibers. Recently, Lee et al [15] presented a highly-conductive electrospun polyethylene oxide (PEO) nanowire carbon nanotube (CNT) composite, using poly(styrene sulfonic acid graft aniline) (PSS-g-ANI) as an amphiphilic surfactant to create a stable solution of the CNT and the polymer. High electrical conductivity (1570 S/m) was reported, comparing well to the intrinsic conductivity of conductive polymers varying from 10 −14 –10 2 S/cm [16].…”
Section: Randomly-aligned Nanowiresmentioning
confidence: 99%