2006
DOI: 10.1021/jp0574347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Evaluation of Liquid Densities Using van der Waals Molecular Models

Abstract: A new approach is presented to estimate molar volumes and densities of liquids in ambient conditions from van der Waals models, taking advantage of the correlation between the intermolecular volume and the atomic contributions to the molecular surface area. Using this approach, the role of hydrogen bonds can be quantified. The densities obtained prove remarkably close to the values derived from the ACD group contribution method. However, the present approach requires much less empirical parameters and may be a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,10 While the determination of the relevant mechanisms can be extremely difficult for biological activities or toxicological end points, making assumptions regarding the underlying physics, in principle, is easier for the physicochemical properties of chemicals, because they are not dependent on the complex interactions that characterize biological functions. As a matter of fact, such models based on equations derived from physical considerations have been shown to systematically outperform QSPR methods for many properties, including densities 11 and flash point 12 of liquids, melting points 13 and sublimation enthalpies 14 of crystals, Gurney velocities of explosives, 15 and heats of decomposition of organic substances. 16−18 On the other hand, growing safety concerns and recent regulations, including the European Union (EU) REACH legislation, require the evaluation of more-complex physicochemical properties, such as dust explosivity 19 or the impact sensitivity of chemical energetic substances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 While the determination of the relevant mechanisms can be extremely difficult for biological activities or toxicological end points, making assumptions regarding the underlying physics, in principle, is easier for the physicochemical properties of chemicals, because they are not dependent on the complex interactions that characterize biological functions. As a matter of fact, such models based on equations derived from physical considerations have been shown to systematically outperform QSPR methods for many properties, including densities 11 and flash point 12 of liquids, melting points 13 and sublimation enthalpies 14 of crystals, Gurney velocities of explosives, 15 and heats of decomposition of organic substances. 16−18 On the other hand, growing safety concerns and recent regulations, including the European Union (EU) REACH legislation, require the evaluation of more-complex physicochemical properties, such as dust explosivity 19 or the impact sensitivity of chemical energetic substances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they often require extensive experimental data to fit the parameters involved. For simple fluid properties, such as liquid densities, approaches based on physical insight yield better results [9]. On the other hand, straightforward applications of regression techniques to extended datasets fail to take advantage of the fact that even complex prop- * Tel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would require a well-defined procedure to derive atomic volumes from available liquid data. MATEO predictions of liquid densities rely on a very simple assumption concerning the dependence of the atomic molar volume on van der Waals parameters, which was found to work remarkably well [35]. Preliminary unpublished data indicate that even more reliable liquid densities will be obtained on the basis of the ARH approach [33].…”
Section: Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the compound ). Custom components include EEMEO for molecular charge distributions [36], DFT-ENTHALPY for sublimation enthalpies and solid-state formation enthalpies (Section 3.2), ARH [33] and SUBDLIQ [35] for densities, respectively in the crystal and liquid states. is assumed to be a cation, and the sublimation enthalpy of the corresponding nitrate salt is then directly evaluated by the DFT-ENTHALPY module [37].…”
Section: Overview Of the Mateo Packagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation