2013 Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing (ICICIP) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icicip.2013.6568143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved extended Kalman fusion method for upper limb motion estimation with inertial sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, previous studies find the applicability of systems with equal or even lower frequency. These studies are targeted to motion estimation, but down sample inertial sensor data from commercial or custom IMUs at a final frequency of 50 Hz [ 43 , 63 ], use the system for rehabilitation supervision at a sampling rate of 40 Hz [ 36 ], or perform ambulatory human joint motion monitoring at 50 Hz [ 64 ]. Other limitations of the system regarding the kinematic model have been commented in Section 2.4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, previous studies find the applicability of systems with equal or even lower frequency. These studies are targeted to motion estimation, but down sample inertial sensor data from commercial or custom IMUs at a final frequency of 50 Hz [ 43 , 63 ], use the system for rehabilitation supervision at a sampling rate of 40 Hz [ 36 ], or perform ambulatory human joint motion monitoring at 50 Hz [ 64 ]. Other limitations of the system regarding the kinematic model have been commented in Section 2.4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, various research studies have been done to analyze human actions based on wearable sensors [9]. A large number of these studies focus on identifying which are the most informative features that can be extracted from the actions data as well as in searching which are the most effective machine learning algorithms for classifying these actions [10]. Wearable sensors attached to human anatomical references, e.g., inertial and magnetic sensors (accelerometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers), vital sign processing devices (heart rate, temperature) and RFID tags, can be used to gather information about the behavioral patterns of a person.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another line of research is to find the most appropriate computational model to represent human action data. However, the robustness to model parameters of many existing human action recognition techniques are still quite limited [10]. In addition, the feature sets used for the classification do not describe how the actions were performed in terms of human motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%