2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2021)175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved (g − 2)μ measurement and singlino dark matter in μ-term extended ℤ3-NMSSM

Abstract: Very recently, a Fermilab report of muon g− 2 showed a 4.2σ discrepancy between it and the standard model (SM) prediction. Motivated by this inspiring result and the increasing tension in supersymmetric interpretation of the anomalous magnetic moment, it is argued that in the general next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model (GNMSSM), a singlino-dominated neutralino can act as a feasible dark matter (DM) candidate in explaining the discrepancy naturally. In this case, the singlino-dominated DM and singlet-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(167 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a SUSY µ is insensitive to Yukawa coupling λ because the Singlino field has no mixing with Wino and Bino fields, and it does not couple directly to the muon lepton. As a result, the formulae to calculate a SUSY µ in NMSSM are same as those at the lowest order of the mass-insertion approximation in MSSM [66]. Considering these features, we expected that the Bino-dominated DM case in the Z 3 -NMSSM and MSSM would not show significant differences in explaining the discrepancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, a SUSY µ is insensitive to Yukawa coupling λ because the Singlino field has no mixing with Wino and Bino fields, and it does not couple directly to the muon lepton. As a result, the formulae to calculate a SUSY µ in NMSSM are same as those at the lowest order of the mass-insertion approximation in MSSM [66]. Considering these features, we expected that the Bino-dominated DM case in the Z 3 -NMSSM and MSSM would not show significant differences in explaining the discrepancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…• In the case that the DM co-annihilates with Wino-dominated particles to obtain the measured abundance, the Higgsino mass prefers to be much larger than the DM mass, which was explained in Appendix A of this work. In addition, the SUSY contribution to the moment, a SUSY µ , mainly comes from the WHL diagrams after considering the experimental constraints (W , H, and L stand for Wino, Higgsino, and left-handed slepton fields, respectively) [66]. This contribution is proportional to µM 2 tan β/m 2 μL [33], and thus a large |µ| is preferred to predict a sizable a SUSY µ , given that M 2 is relatively small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the new result by the Fermilab has come out, the SUSY interpretation for muon g − 2 anomaly have been discussed in many works . Generally speaking, it is not easy to explain the muon g − 2 anomaly in SUGRA-type models [70][71][72] (unlike the MSSM which can readily give sufficient contributions to the muon g − 2 [67,[73][74][75][76][77]). Large SUSY contributions to ∆a µ in general require light sleptons and light electroweakinos [73,74].…”
Section: Jhep12(2021)219mentioning
confidence: 99%