2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a divalent DNA vaccine encoding Brucella L7/L12-truncated Omp31 fusion protein by a DNA priming and protein boosting regimen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, mice immunized with the DNA priming and protein boosting vaccination regimen of Brucella outer membrane protein 31 and L7/L12 exhibited significantly enhanced antigen‐specific antibody titre, IFN‐γ production in splenocytes and resistance to challenge with live Brucella pathogens (Golshani et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, mice immunized with the DNA priming and protein boosting vaccination regimen of Brucella outer membrane protein 31 and L7/L12 exhibited significantly enhanced antigen‐specific antibody titre, IFN‐γ production in splenocytes and resistance to challenge with live Brucella pathogens (Golshani et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Specific antibodies are important in reducing the initial phase of a Brucella infection, but a strong humoral immunity unaccompanied by cell-mediated immunity (CMI) cannot provide total protection against the Brucella organism (Lalsiamthara and Lee, 2017). In some situations, inoculation with "naked" plasmid DNA has been shown to not produce an immune response as strong as either purified protein or even a commercial Brucella vaccine (Cassataro et al, 2007;Golshani et al, 2015). DNA vaccines may be less potent than live attenuated vaccines because DNA is not as evenly distributed among initially transfected cells, while the number of cells infected with the live attenuated microorganism increases as it replicates (Kano et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered a strategy capable of inducing a type 1 immune response (Th1) associated with IFN-γ producing CD4 + T cells, CD8 + cytotoxic T cells and IgG2a antibodies produced by B cells, all of which are necessary to eliminate infection by B. abortus (Golding et al, 2001). In addition, it is possible to enhance DNA vaccine immune responses by using a DNA prime-protein boost (Cassataro et al, 2007;Golshani et al, 2015). An initial immunization with DNA, followed by enhancement with recombinant VirB genes vaccines against Brucella abortus s3 protein, can increase the efficacy of a vaccine against Brucella infection (Cassataro et al, 2007;Golshani et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT), plate agglutination test (PAT), standard tube agglutination test (SAT), complement fixation test (CFT), Coombs anti-Brucella test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are considered to be the main methods for serological diagnosis of brucellosis disease [6][7][8]. However, these methods usually use the whole cell or smooth lipopolysaccharides (S-LPS) as the antigen to detect Bru- cella antibodies in the patient's serum, which can lead to false positives and cross-reactivity with other Gram-negative bacteria such as Yersinia entercolitica O:9 [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%