“…In (Paulavičius and Žilinskas 2007), we have shown that, for n = 4, the number of function evaluations is smaller by 13% on the average and, for n = 5, 6, the number of function evaluations is smaller by 37% on the average, if combination (7) is used. In (Paulavičius and Žilinskas 2008b) it has been shown that the improved upper bound F (8) gives better results for Lipschitz optimization than that used as usual. Depending on the dimensionality of test problems, the number of function evaluations is from 4% to 30% smaller than with a simpler bound.…”