2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2015.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved method for enumerating sulfate-reducing bacteria using optical density

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter was assumed to be an equal biomass distribution among constituting species. To estimate this distribution, total biomass concentration in C-mol l −1 was approximated from the experimental OD (at 600 nm) measurements at the start of the experiment (electronic supplementary material, table S4) and using a previously calibrated relationship between OD and biomass using sulfate-reducing bacteria ( predominantly Desulfovibrio vulgaris) [38]; ln(DW) = 5.12 • OD600 -4.987, where DW is the dry weight of the cells in g l −1 . We converted the resulting DW value to 1 C mol −1 by dividing it by the molecular weight of the generic molecule used to represent biomass (C 1 H 1.8 O 0.5 N 0.2 , [27]); 24.6 g.C mol −1 .…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter was assumed to be an equal biomass distribution among constituting species. To estimate this distribution, total biomass concentration in C-mol l −1 was approximated from the experimental OD (at 600 nm) measurements at the start of the experiment (electronic supplementary material, table S4) and using a previously calibrated relationship between OD and biomass using sulfate-reducing bacteria ( predominantly Desulfovibrio vulgaris) [38]; ln(DW) = 5.12 • OD600 -4.987, where DW is the dry weight of the cells in g l −1 . We converted the resulting DW value to 1 C mol −1 by dividing it by the molecular weight of the generic molecule used to represent biomass (C 1 H 1.8 O 0.5 N 0.2 , [27]); 24.6 g.C mol −1 .…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial optical density (OD) recorded for this experiment was approximately 0.025 (da Silva et al, 2013). No calibration to other units was performed by these authors and few exist in the literature for Desulfovibrio strains, but Bernardez and de Andrade Lima (2015) suggested a conversion of: dry weight (mg) = exp (5.12 OD–4.987), which gives an approximate initial bacterial concentration for this experiment of 7.76 mg L –1 . Although the conditions under which this conversion was derived differ from the experiment of da Silva et al (2013), this estimate compares well to that of our model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The protocol for acid-amended OD (aaOD) growth estimation was modified from Bernardez and De Andrade Lima [1] which details the use of relatively large culture volumes (45 mL) to estimate microbial biomass from OD readings following the dissolution of iron precipitates using HCl. We have adapted this method to a high throughput microtiter plate approach that is more time efficient, does not require cell washing steps and, due the incorporation of smaller aliquot volumes (180 μL), allows for collection of higher resolution time series data (Supplementary Table S1).…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%