2017 20th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/icif.2017.8009626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved multi-resolution method for MLE-based localization of radiation sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the nine source-separation experiments conducted using a survey pattern (see Section III-B), APSL reconstructed two discrete sources in six of the eight runs that had a non-zero true separation. In these six survey runs (19,21,23,25,27,29), the reconstructed separations were within 15 cm of the true separation. The minimum true separation for which this level of accuracy was achieved was 76 cm (run 19), with an average and standard deviation reconstructed separation over 10 random seeds of 82 ± 2 cm.…”
Section: A Apsl Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the nine source-separation experiments conducted using a survey pattern (see Section III-B), APSL reconstructed two discrete sources in six of the eight runs that had a non-zero true separation. In these six survey runs (19,21,23,25,27,29), the reconstructed separations were within 15 cm of the true separation. The minimum true separation for which this level of accuracy was achieved was 76 cm (run 19), with an average and standard deviation reconstructed separation over 10 random seeds of 82 ± 2 cm.…”
Section: A Apsl Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In previous work [16], we proposed Additive Point Source Localization (APSL), a sparse parametric image reconstruction algorithm, as an alternative to ML-EM, MAP-EM, and several other previous methods [12], [17]- [25]. APSL is proposed for sparse 3D scenarios with multiple point sources and unknown backgrounds, a situation where previous methods may have limited utility due to algorithmic assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area of radiation field mapping and source localization has been studied through a set of contributions such as [2][3][4][5][6]. Among them, maximum likelihood estimation is utilized in [4,6], numerical adjoints in conjuction to a bayesian formulation are used in [2], while a particle filter is employed in [3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area of radiation field mapping and source localization has been studied through a set of contributions such as [2][3][4][5][6]. Among them, maximum likelihood estimation is utilized in [4,6], numerical adjoints in conjuction to a bayesian formulation are used in [2], while a particle filter is employed in [3]. These methods focus on the problem of estimating discrete sources and tend to assume the availability of a large number of spatially distributed measurements -typically provided using an array of fixed sensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A visual example of an MLE localization is shown in Figure 8. Note that the likelihood function in (3) is a simplification of the logarithm of the joint Poisson probability for the likelihood of the measurements at each individual detector [11].…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%