2018
DOI: 10.1177/1687814018760082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved non-dimensional dynamic influence function method for vibration analysis of arbitrarily shaped plates with simply supported edges

Abstract: An analytical method for free vibration analysis of arbitrarily shaped plates with simply supported edges is presented using the non-dimensional dynamic influence function (NDIF) method, which was introduced by the author. A major difficulty in the theoretical formulation of the proposed method is to analytically measure the values of diagonal elements of the system matrix that gives the eigenvalues and mode shapes of the plate of interest. In addition, particular attentions are given to remove the spurious ei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is explained using equation ( 9) why the determinant of the system matrix is calculated as a meaningless value in the low frequency parameter range of L \ 8.3 for N = 32 in Figure 3. Although N eigenvalues are numerically calculated from equation (10) in the range of L \ 8.3, the higher-order eigenvalues l R(L) + 1 , l R(L) + 2 , ., l N become meaningless values because the rank R(L) is less than N. Thanks to this fact, equation (9) calculated by the product of the N eigenvalues including the higher-order eigenvalues also has a meaningless value. Based on this findings, the determinant of the system matrix is calculated by the product of only the valid eigenvalues l 1 , l 2 , ., l R(L) excluding the invalid eigenvalues l R(L)…”
Section: Calculating the Determinant Of The Singular System Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is explained using equation ( 9) why the determinant of the system matrix is calculated as a meaningless value in the low frequency parameter range of L \ 8.3 for N = 32 in Figure 3. Although N eigenvalues are numerically calculated from equation (10) in the range of L \ 8.3, the higher-order eigenvalues l R(L) + 1 , l R(L) + 2 , ., l N become meaningless values because the rank R(L) is less than N. Thanks to this fact, equation (9) calculated by the product of the N eigenvalues including the higher-order eigenvalues also has a meaningless value. Based on this findings, the determinant of the system matrix is calculated by the product of only the valid eigenvalues l 1 , l 2 , ., l R(L) excluding the invalid eigenvalues l R(L)…”
Section: Calculating the Determinant Of The Singular System Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the section, an appropriate way of obtaining mode shapes of the membrane of interest is proposed after a deep study. The j th mode shape for the j th eigenvalue L j extracted by equation (11) for the rectangular membrane (N = 32) can be obtained by utilizing equation (10) as follows. Inserting L = L j into equation (10) yields…”
Section: Extracting Mode Shapes From the Singular System Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations