2016
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201500036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved nonparametric estimation of the optimal diagnostic cut‐off point associated with the Youden index under different sampling schemes

Abstract: A diagnostic cut-off point of a biomarker measurement is needed for classifying a random subject to be either diseased or healthy. However, the cut-off point is usually unknown and needs to be estimated by some optimization criteria. One important criterion is the Youden index, which has been widely adopted in practice. The Youden index, which is defined as the maximum of (sensitivity + specificity -1), directly measures the largest total diagnostic accuracy a biomarker can achieve. Therefore, it is desirable … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the training set, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the PNI for predicting locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis and death, and the Youden index was estimated to determine the optimal cutoff value of the PNI (Yin et al 2016). The testing set was then stratified according to the optimum cut-off value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the training set, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the PNI for predicting locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis and death, and the Youden index was estimated to determine the optimal cutoff value of the PNI (Yin et al 2016). The testing set was then stratified according to the optimum cut-off value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients diagnosed with AD fulfilled the dementia criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revision, and the criteria for probable AD as defined by NINCDS-ADRDA 13 . We re-selected a cohort of the patients where we included 44 healthy control (CTRL), 86 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 25 AD, 6 MDD subjects (see Table 1 for full biomarker and demographic characteristics) discriminated by using a cut off established by a ROC curve towards Aβ 1-42 (<390 pg/ml with a Se=64% and Spe=68% with a Youden index=0.97 14 ) and T-tau level (>84 pg/ml with a Se=68% and Spe=68% with a Youden Index=1 14 ). Applying this cut-off in the MCI group we observed a clear separation in two groups, according CSF biomarkers profile, one closer to the CTRL profile (MCI=50) and the other one closer to the AD profile (prodromal AD=36).…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally Youden index is used to evaluate biomarker levels in the investigation and diagnosis of disease. Disease diagnosis by biomarkers is dependent upon a correlation between biomarker levels and disease state, whereby biomarker levels for a certain diseased population are different–usually higher–than in the corresponding non-diseased population 32 , 33 . Figure 2 showed the more osteogenic differentiation progressed, the more migration-speed decreased so stem cell homogeneity is dependent upon a correlation between migration speed and osteogenic differentiation state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%