2010 Joint Rail Conference, Volume 1 2010
DOI: 10.1115/jrc2010-36222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Performance Track Components for Heavy Axle Loads and High Speed Rail

Abstract: North American railways have experienced significant traffic growth over the past 20 years to the point where many lines are at or near capacity. While the current worldwide recession has eased capacity constraints momentarily, the long-term trends are for continued traffic growth. Faced with the prospects of perhaps doubling freight traffic demand in the next 20 years and adding significant passenger traffic, the railroads are developing cost effective ways to increase capacity. Besides constructing additiona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Greco et al and Lonetti et al [13,14] put forward a numerical strategy based on a moving mesh technique to simulate the vehicle-bridge interaction in railway bridges and then evaluated the influence of coupling effects between bridge deformations and moving loads considering the neglected nonstandard terms in the inertial forces concerning both centripetal acceleration and Coriolis acceleration, providing an advanced numerical modeling approach. Davis et al [15] put forward a finite element model for single-wheel-impact turnouts considering the accumulated plastic strain under cyclic wheel loads and the variable adaptability of profile spaces, and then a contrast analysis on the influence of three kinds of frog materials on the growth of cracks based on the obtained wheel-rail contact/shear/residual stresses and a two-dimensional (2D) crack model was performed. Pletz et al [16,17] presented a dynamic finite element model for wheels passing through frog and obtained the dynamic wheel-frog contact force and vertical wheel displacement as well as the angular velocity of the wheels, the generation of the stress field, and the plastic deformation of frogs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greco et al and Lonetti et al [13,14] put forward a numerical strategy based on a moving mesh technique to simulate the vehicle-bridge interaction in railway bridges and then evaluated the influence of coupling effects between bridge deformations and moving loads considering the neglected nonstandard terms in the inertial forces concerning both centripetal acceleration and Coriolis acceleration, providing an advanced numerical modeling approach. Davis et al [15] put forward a finite element model for single-wheel-impact turnouts considering the accumulated plastic strain under cyclic wheel loads and the variable adaptability of profile spaces, and then a contrast analysis on the influence of three kinds of frog materials on the growth of cracks based on the obtained wheel-rail contact/shear/residual stresses and a two-dimensional (2D) crack model was performed. Pletz et al [16,17] presented a dynamic finite element model for wheels passing through frog and obtained the dynamic wheel-frog contact force and vertical wheel displacement as well as the angular velocity of the wheels, the generation of the stress field, and the plastic deformation of frogs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Both HAL and HSR types of traffic require special trackwork components that minimize impact loads. 11 However, notable differences between HAL and HSR in terms of design requirements and loading conditions have created a variety of challenges related to special trackwork. The primary difference is the priority given to considerations for passenger comfort and diverging speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HSR lines require that turnouts and crossings minimize or eliminate the need to slow the train while maintaining passenger safety and comfort. 11 Increases in diverging speed and rider comfort can be achieved through optimal turnout geometries and the use of movable point frogs. 11 Another alternative is to orient turnouts such that the direction of high-speed traffic corresponds with the straight movement through the turnout.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations