2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9an02111f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved RNA modification mapping of cellular non-coding RNAs using C- and U-specific RNases

Abstract: Improved RNA modification mapping through complementary nucleobase-specific ribonucleases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that although RlmKL installs methyl groups at two different positions (2069 and 2,445) of 23S rRNA compared to RlmB (at position 2,251) ( Popova and Williamson, 2014 ; Sergiev et al, 2018 ), the latter strain seems to be more susceptible to oxidative stress ( Figure 4 ). Further studies involving modification mapping experiments ( Sun et al, 2020 ; Thakur et al, 2020 ) could identify the exact locations in the sequence that might serve as hotspots for oxidative damage. Nevertheless, these studies indicate that although some post-transcriptional methylations are not essential for normal growth, their absence could aggravate the vulnerability of rRNA to oxidative damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that although RlmKL installs methyl groups at two different positions (2069 and 2,445) of 23S rRNA compared to RlmB (at position 2,251) ( Popova and Williamson, 2014 ; Sergiev et al, 2018 ), the latter strain seems to be more susceptible to oxidative stress ( Figure 4 ). Further studies involving modification mapping experiments ( Sun et al, 2020 ; Thakur et al, 2020 ) could identify the exact locations in the sequence that might serve as hotspots for oxidative damage. Nevertheless, these studies indicate that although some post-transcriptional methylations are not essential for normal growth, their absence could aggravate the vulnerability of rRNA to oxidative damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang, Shi, et al, 2019). Recently, multiple RNases were used to generate unique, overlapping digestion products, which has bypassed the need for the RNA to be highly purified (Thakur, Estevez, Lobue, Limbach, & Addepalli, 2020). Because LC-MS can be limited by the RNase cleavage site, novel RNases that have different substrate specificities can be helpful in sequence-specific detection of modifications (Addepalli et al, 2017).…”
Section: Mass Spectrometry-based Methods Of Detecting Modified Ribonucleosidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5-aminomethyl-2-geranylthiouridine, 425.1984 Da from epoxyqueuosine, 425.1547 Da); when no standard is available. Nucleoside analysis is then followed by the generation of oligomers of manageable size (5-mers to 20-mers) via the use of base-specific nucleases prior to chromatographic separation and mass spectrometric analysis (Thakur et al 2020). These approaches have been used successfully to sequence tRNAs but can easily be used with other types of RNAs.…”
Section: Modification Diversity and The Limits Of Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly the drawback with LC MS/MS has always been the requirement for relatively large amounts of pure sample, however, as chromatographic technology continues to improve, sample consumption continues to decrease. Recently the implementation of new base-specific nucleases has permitted the analysis of modification in their natural sequence context in complex mixtures (Thakur et al 2020). So the future for mass spectrometry based approaches is bright and in our opinion is truly the way of the future.…”
Section: Modification Diversity and The Limits Of Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%