1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(95)00235-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved size homogeneity of InP-on-GaInP Stranski-Krastanow islands by growth on a thin GaP interface layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at larger flat areas residues of the wetting layer or partially formed QD's may be present and consistently we sometimes detect strong luminescence from these. The peak positions and their linewidths are in rough agreement with theoretical and experimental results for InP quantum wells by Carlsson et al 19,20 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, at larger flat areas residues of the wetting layer or partially formed QD's may be present and consistently we sometimes detect strong luminescence from these. The peak positions and their linewidths are in rough agreement with theoretical and experimental results for InP quantum wells by Carlsson et al 19,20 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Further details of the growth have been presented elsewhere. 19,20 To enhance surface properties for STM and STL measurements, the samples were sulphur passivated by immersion into a 2% ammonium sulphide solution kept at 55°C for 30 min. The samples were then baked at 120°C for 12 h in the load lock before transfer into the UHV chamber.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…higher levels of self-ordering in other words, has been observed before in 3D InP islands on (Ga,In)P, which was lattice matched to GaAs, as a result of the deposition of a GaP layer in the ML range 23 . As in our case, the formation of smaller and less isotropically shaped 3D islands was suppressed in favor of the formation of larger and more isotropically shaped 3D…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Another growth parameter widely used in literature to tune the QD emission by controlling the QD size has been the growth interruption (GI). Several experimental and theoretical studies are available on the influence of GI on the morphological and optical properties in the In(Ga)As/ GaAs QD systems [10,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. The general trend emerging from these studies is that, when the material supply is interrupted after the deposition of few In(Ga)As monolayers, the total volume of the dots increases with the interruption time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%