Improved teaching–learning-based and JAYA optimization algorithms for solving flexible flow shop scheduling problems

Abstract

Flexible flow shop (or a hybrid flow shop) scheduling problem is an extension of classical flow shop scheduling problem. In a simple flow shop configuration, a job having 'g' operations is performed on 'g' operation centres (stages) with each stage having only one machine. If any stage contains more than one machine for providing alternate processing facility, then the problem becomes a flexible flow shop problem (FFSP). FFSP which contains all the complexities involved in a simple flow shop and parallel machine scheduling problems is a well-known NPhard (Non-deterministic polynomial time) problem. Owing to high computational complexity involved in solving these problems, it is not always possible to obtain an optimal solution in a reasonable computation time. To obtain nearoptimal solutions in a reasonable computation time, a large variety of meta-heuristics have been proposed in the past. However, tuning algorithm-specific parameters for solving FFSP is rather tricky and time consuming. To address this limitation, teaching-learning-based optimization (TLBO) and JAYA algorithm are chosen for the study because these are not only recent meta-heuristics but they do not require tuning of algorithm-specific parameters. Although these algorithms seem to be elegant, they lose solution diversity after few iterations and get trapped at the local optima. To alleviate such drawback, a new local search procedure is proposed in this paper to improve the solution quality. Further, mutation strategy (inspired from genetic algorithm) is incorporated in the basic algorithm to maintain solution diversity in the population. Computational experiments have been conducted on standard benchmark problems to calculate makespan and computational time. It is found that the rate of convergence of TLBO is superior to JAYA. From the results, it is found that TLBO and JAYA outperform many algorithms reported in the literature and can be treated as efficient methods for solving the FFSP.Keywords Flexible flow shop Á JAYA algorithm Á Makespan Á Meta-heuristics Á Teaching-learning-based optimization J Ind Eng Int (2018) 14:555-570 https://doi.

Semi-Steady-State Jaya Algorithm for Optimization

“…Modifications to the standard Jaya algorithm include a self-adaptive multi-population-based Jaya algorithm that was applied to entropy generation minimization of a plate-fin heat exchanger [8], a multi-objective Jaya algorithm that was applied to waterjet machining process optimization [9], and a hybrid parallel Jaya algorithm for a multi-core environment [10]. Application areas of the Jaya algorithm have included such diverse fields as pathological brain detection systems [11], flow-shop scheduling [12], maximum power point tracking problems in photovoltaic systems [13], identification and monitoring of electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface for motor imagery tasks [14], and traffic signal control [15].…”

A generative design technique for exploring shape variations

“…Jaya algorithm and its variations have also been implemented to different fields of science and engineering such as manufacturing [19], classification [20], power [21], combinatorial optimization [22] and topology optimization of truss structures [23].…”

A discrete Jaya algorithm for permutation flow-shop scheduling problem

“…A similar problem was addressed by Guo et al (2017) considering flexible job-shop rescheduling problem. Buddala and Mahapatra (2017) applied TLBO and Jaya algorithm for optimization of flexible flow shop scheduling problem with objective of makespan minimization. Computational results validate the efficiency of Jaya as compared with other meta-heuristics.…”